In a Post -Covid-19 World, What is the Clinical Influence of Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis ?
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 56
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- implant loss
研究概览
简要总结
Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants.
All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 50 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •completely edentulous patients with age range from 50-65 years.
- •physically and psychologically eligible participants for implants placement.
- •adequate bone to receive 4 interforaminal implants.
排除标准
- •participants were excluded if
- •medical conditions that precludes implants placement
- •patients suffering from any parafunctional habits
结局指标
主要结局
implant loss
时间窗: 24 months
The implants were considered surviving if they were clinically stable and functioning without any mobility. Failure was defined removal of implants due to loss of integration, pain, implant mobility, paraesthesia, neuropathies or psychological reasons. Calculation of the estimated failure rate was performed by dividing the number of implant failures by the total exposure time of the implant. The total exposure time is the interval of time the implants could be followed for the entire observation time or up to failure of the implants that were lost during the follow-up period.
次要结局
- crestal bone loss(24 months)
