Clinical Study of Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Chronic Visceral Pain in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 42
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- IBS-symptom severity score
研究概览
简要总结
Objective: To identify a central hub of visceral pain in IBS-D and elucidate the mechanism by which repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) confers analgesic effects.
Design: Combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with visceral sensitivity assessments were used to pinpoint hyperactive brain regions of IBS-D patients. Therefore, a clinical trial was performed to validate the therapeutic potential of rTMS in IBS-D patients.
详细描述
Background:Chronic visceral pain in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is a profound therapeutic challenge. While aberrant central processing is implicated, the key brain regions driving this visceral pain and their suitability as neuromodulatory targets remain undefined.
Methods:Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the sham rTMS or rTMS group using a computer-generated randomization sequence created by an independent researcher who was not involved in recruitment, treatment, or outcome assessment. Allocation concealment was ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were opened only after baseline evaluations were completed.
Both participants and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. The rTMS operators were not involved in data collection or analysis. For the sham condition, the coil was positioned identically over the mPFC with magnetic output disabled, and prerecorded clicking sounds were delivered to mimic the acoustic sensation of stimulation. Participants were asked not to discuss treatment sensations with assessors. Scale raters and fMRI analysts remained blinded until all analyses were finalized.
For the nested fMRI cohort, randomization and blinding procedures were identical, with group allocation revealed only after preprocessing and statistical analysis had been completed.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 75 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •1.Aged between 18 and 75 years (either sex); 2.A diagnosis of IBS-D according to the Rome IV criteria;3.Experience of Bristol stool type 6 or 7 on at least 4 days per week, with a mean abdominal pain score of ≥3 (on a 0-10 scale) during the 2-week screening period.
排除标准
- •1.Inflammatory or organic gastrointestinal diseases; 2.Diabetes mellitus or hyperthyroidism; 3.History of previous anorectal, intestinal, or abdominal surgery; 4.Current use of medications known to alter gastrointestinal motility or secretion; 5.Pregnancy or lactation; 6.Metallic implants or presence of a cardiac pacemaker; 7.Noncompliance with randomized treatment allocation or demonstrated poor adherence to treatment protocols.
结局指标
主要结局
IBS-symptom severity score
时间窗: Assessment time points were: baseline (1 week pre-treatment), end of the 2-week treatment, and post-treatment weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8.
The criteria were based on the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS), a hierarchical efficacy assessment method.The IBS-SSS consists of five entries assessing the degree of abdominal pain and discomfort, frequency of abdominal pain episodes, the degree of abdominal distension and discomfort, the degree of satisfaction with bowel habits and behaviors, and the degree of impact of intestinal symptoms on life,with a total score of 500 points. A score of 75-175 is considered mild, 176-300 is moderate, and over 300 is severe. Cure was defined as a total IBS symptom severity of less than 75; efficacy was defined as 2-level improvement in total score(e.g., symptoms improved from severe to mild); validity was defined as a 1-level improvement in tatal(e.g., symptoms improved from severe to moderate or symptoms from moderate to mild); and invalidity was defined as no improvement or deterioration in total score.
次要结局
- anorectal manometry(Assessment time points were: baseline (1 week pre-treatment), end of the 2-week treatment, and post-treatment weeks 4 and 8.)
研究者
Rui Li
Chief of the Department of Gastroenterology
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University