跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03908034
NCT03908034Unknown不适用

Consumer Motivation for Disease Prevention

Chinese University of Hong Kong1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2019年4月4日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Decision to remove X

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to examine (1) how the causal structure of a disease influences people's disease prevention decisions; and (2) how the causal structure of a disease interacts with people's regret anticipation in determining their disease prevention decisions.

详细描述

People sometimes have to deliberate on whether or not to remove a risk factor that may potentially cause a disease in the future. When a controllable risk factor (say, X) is the only factor that causes a disease, the decision to remove it may simply depend on the probabilistic relationship between X and an outcome, as well as the cost of removing X. However, little is known when other factors that are out of the decision-maker's control are also present. The main question being asked here is how does the presence of such uncontrollable factors change people's decision to remove X.

Specifically, the investigators consider two cases: a disease caused by a single controllable risk factor (say X) and a disease caused by two risk factors -- a controllable factor (X) and an uncontrollable factor (Y). In both cases, the removal of X can result in a meaningful reduction in overall disease risk. It is hypothesized that even when the magnitude of overall risk reduction brought by the removal of X is the same in the two cases, people would have a lower motivation to remove X in the latter case.

The investigators also examine how the presence of an uncontrollable risk factor interacts with the respondents' regret anticipation to influence their decision to remove X. In the context of the current research, regret anticipation could take one of the following forms: (a) feel regretful if one decides not to remove X and later develops the disease (b) feel regretful if one decides to remove X but still develops the disease. The investigators expect (a) to moderate the effect of uncontrollable risk factor on motivation to remove X.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Other
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

盲法说明

Each participant will only receive the instruction pertaining to the arm to which he/she is assigned. The Research Assistant who conducts the study does not know about the hypothesis.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • students enrolled in marketing courses at the Chinese University of Hong Kong

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Uncontrollable factor ABSENT; NO anticipated regret induced

No Intervention

The experiment comprises 10 rounds of decision tasks. For each round, the participant begins with having 130 points, each worth $0.5 (Hong Kong dollars). Different numbers of points are deducted depending on the outcome in each round. After the 10 rounds, the computer randomly selects 1 of the rounds and the points from this round is paid in cash.

There is a chance for the participant to develop a disease. Without prevention, the chance of getting the disease is 60%. A cause, X, is identified for the disease. The participant has to decide whether or not to remove X. Removal of X reduces disease chance; the reduced chance varies between 10% and 50% across the 10 rounds and the exact level is communicated at the beginning of each round. The removal of X costs 30 points. Whether s/he ends up developing the disease or not is determined by a computerized lottery based on these chances. If s/he develops the disease, s/he will lose 100 points.

Uncontrollable factor ABSENT; anticipated regret induced

Experimental

Same description as in the "uncontrollable factor absent, no anticipated regret induced" arm, except that the participants are induced to think to what extent they will feel regretful: a) if s/he decides not to remove X but ends up developing the disease and b) if s/he decides to remove X but still gets the disease.

干预措施: induction of anticipated regret (Other)

Uncontrollable factor PRESENT; NO anticipated regret induced

Experimental

The experiment comprises 10 rounds of decision tasks. For each round, the participant begins with having 130 points, each worth $0.5. Different numbers of points are deducted depending on the outcome in each round. After the 10 rounds, the computer randomly selects 1 of the rounds and the points from this round is paid in cash.

There is a chance for the participant to develop a disease. Without prevention, the chance of getting the disease is 60%. Two causes, X and Y, are identified for the disease. The participant has to decide whether or not to remove X. Removal of X reduces disease chance; the reduced chance varies between 10% and 50% across the 10 rounds and the exact level is communicated at the beginning of each round. The removal of X costs 30 points. Whether s/he ends up developing the disease or not is determined by a computerized lottery based on these chances. If s/he develops the disease, s/he will lose 100 points.

干预措施: presence of uncontrollable risk factor (Other)

Uncontrollable factor PRESENT; anticipated regret induced

Experimental

Same as the "uncontrollable factor present, no anticipated regret induced" arm, except that the participants are induced to think to what extent they will feel regretful: a) if s/he decides not to remove X but ends up developing the disease and b) if s/he decides to remove X but still gets the disease.

干预措施: presence of uncontrollable risk factor (Other)

Uncontrollable factor PRESENT; anticipated regret induced

Experimental

Same as the "uncontrollable factor present, no anticipated regret induced" arm, except that the participants are induced to think to what extent they will feel regretful: a) if s/he decides not to remove X but ends up developing the disease and b) if s/he decides to remove X but still gets the disease.

干预措施: induction of anticipated regret (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Decision to remove X

时间窗: Day 1: When responding to the questionnaire

The decision to remove X (yes vs. no)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yeung Wing Man

Associate Professor of Marketing

Chinese University of Hong Kong

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验