Swiss Cohort of Health Professionals and Informal Caregivers - SCOHPICA
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 6,000
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [1]
研究概览
简要总结
The healthcare system is continuously evolving to adapt to the population's needs, both in terms of healthcare practices, and in financial and organizational aspects. The current COVID-19 pandemic has added additional pressure to the healthcare system and shown its limits in terms of preparedness. It has also shown once again that both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and informal caregivers (ICs) play a central role for the functioning of the healthcare system.
An increasing number of studies are alerting on HCPs' situation, regarding their physical and mental health (e.g. emotional exhaustion, professional well-being) on the one hand, and the functioning of the healthcare system (e.g. absenteeism, turnover, career change) on the other hand.
Besides healthcare professionals, ICs, defined as "a person in the immediate entourage of an individual whose health and/or autonomy is impaired and who requires assistance with certain [basic or instrumental] activities of daily living. The IC provides the person, on a non-professional and informal basis, and on a regular basis, with assistance, care or presence services of varying nature and intensity, designed to compensate for their incapacities or difficulties or to ensure their safety, identity and social ties". Caring for others has shown to have negative impact on the ICs' life, in terms of health-related implications, psychological burden, quality of life, etc. Despite being increasingly recognized as having a key role in the provision of care, they have only been limitedly considered in studies on healthcare professionals.
In that context, the investigators develop SCOHPICA project, the Swiss cohort of healthcare professionals and informal caregivers, which is an open prospective national cohort using a concurrent embedded mixed method design. This project targets all types of HCPs and ICs, and will investigate determinants of intent to stay and well-being according to participants' trajectories.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Working as HCP, in any profession
- •Taking care of patients currently and actively
- •Working in any health work setting
- •Working as an independent or a salaried
- •Working in Switzerland
排除标准
- •Being retired at baseline
- •Unable to read or speak in one of the national languages: German, French, Italian
- •Inclusion Criteria (ICs):
- •Being informal cargiver
- •Aged 18 and over (adults)
- •Exclusion Criteria (ICs):
- •Unable to read or speak in one of the national languages: German, French, Italian
研究组 & 干预措施
Healthcare professionals
All type of healthcare professionals (HCPs), working in a variety of settings and across Switzerland
干预措施: Electronic surveys (Other)
Healthcare professionals
All type of healthcare professionals (HCPs), working in a variety of settings and across Switzerland
干预措施: Qualitative Interviews (Other)
Informal caregivers
All type of informal caregivers (ICs), aged 18 and over, assisting a person for health reasons across Switzerland
干预措施: Electronic surveys (Other)
Informal caregivers
All type of informal caregivers (ICs), aged 18 and over, assisting a person for health reasons across Switzerland
干预措施: Qualitative Interviews (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [1]
时间窗: At baseline
Professional trajectories will be formulated based on socio-professional information (current and past occupation, education, work setting, career continuity, part-time contracts). Clustering procedures will be used to group healthcare professionals with similar trajectories, building thus a typology of professional trajectories in the Swiss health workforce.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [2]
时间窗: 1 year after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [3]
时间窗: 2 years after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [4]
时间窗: 3 years after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [5]
时间窗: 4 years after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [1]
时间窗: At baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [2]
时间窗: 1 year after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [3]
时间窗: 2 years after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [4]
时间窗: 3 years after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [5]
时间窗: 4 years after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [1]
时间窗: At baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [2]
时间窗: 1 year after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [3]
时间窗: 2 years after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [4]
时间窗: 3 years after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [5]
时间窗: 4 years after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Well-being (HCPs) [1]
时间窗: At baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [2]
时间窗: 1 year after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [3]
时间窗: 2 years after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [4]
时间窗: 3 years after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [5]
时间窗: 4 years after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
次要结局
未报告次要终点