跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02522845
NCT02522845已完成不适用

Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Compression Therapy Following Endothermal Ablation (COMETA)

Imperial College London2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 204 人开始时间: 2015年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
204
试验地点
2
主要终点
Patient's Post-procedure Pain Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

研究概览

简要总结

This study will be looking at the effect of compression therapy in patients having endovenous treatment for truncal incompetence of their varicose veins using either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or endovenous laser therapy (EVLT). Patients will be randomised to either the compression group (group A) or the no compression group (group B).

The pain scores, compliance, quality of life scores, occlusion rate at 6 months as well as the cost effectiveness of each intervention will be assessed.

详细描述

Background

Varicose veins are common and are known to affect approximately one third of the population. Chronic venous disease (CVD) has been shown to have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and treatment of varicose veins has been demonstrated to lead to improvement in the quality of life of patients. Over the past decade, new endovenous techniques have been introduced and these are felt to be cost-effective, especially, when performed in an outpatient or 'office-based' setting.

There is currently uncertainty about the use of compression stockings following treatment of varicose veins. In their consensus statement in 2008, the International Union of Phlebology (IUP) stated that there is good evidence for using compression in certain clinical indications. These include the management of telangiectasia after sclerotherapy, varicose veins in pregnancy, prevention of thromboembolism and healing of ulcers. However, a few questions remain unanswered, such as the length of treatment and level of compression to be used6. The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum recommend using compression stockings post-operatively for 1 week to prevent haematoma formation, pain and swelling. The 2013 NICE Guidelines on Varicose Veins in the Legs recommended the use of compression hosiery for no more than 7 days after interventional treatment for varicose veins. However, due to current uncertainty of compression bandaging or hosiery compared to no compression after interventional treatment for varicose veins, the NICE Guideline Development Group have advocated further research to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of this post-procedure intervention. The guidelines also suggested looking into the length of time compression bandaging should be worn if it shown to be beneficial.

Several researchers have looked into the practice of using compression after venous ablation. In a survey of the management of varicose veins by the members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Edwards et al. found that the majority of surgeons used bandages post-operatively, with 49% using elastic bandages. The literature on the use of compression stockings following treatment of varicose vein is limited.

Between December 2006 and February 2008, Bakker and colleagues conducted a prospective randomised controlled trial on the use of compression stockings after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein. One hundred and nine patients were approached with 93 finally randomised to use compression stockings for 2 days (Group A) and 7 days (Group B), respectively. All patients were followed up for 3 months post-treatment and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was recorded at 48 hours, 1 week and 6 weeks. A physical examination and quality of life was assessed at 1 week and 6 weeks. Occlusion rate at the 3 month point was also evaluated. Physical function and vitality was shown to be significantly better in group B at 1 week follow-up, but there was no statistically significant difference at 6 weeks. At 1 week, it was also noted that the VAS score in group B (VAS score 2.0 ± 1.1) was significantly lower than in patients wearing compression stockings for 48 hours (VAS score 3.7 ± 2.1) (p≤0.001)10. No significant difference was, however, observed at 6 weeks post-procedure. Limitations of the study include the high drop out of the trial (40 out of the initial 109 approached) and the absence of any phlebectomies or sclerotherapy in the patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults over 18 years of age
  • Symptomatic GSV or SSV vein reflux > 0.5 seconds on colour Duplex

排除标准

  • Current DVT
  • Recurrent varicose veins
  • Patients requiring adjuvant treatment of varicose veins
  • Arterial disease (ABPI<0.8)
  • Vein diameter < 3mm
  • Patient who are unwilling to participate
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires

结局指标

主要结局

Patient's Post-procedure Pain Score Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

时间窗: Up to 10 days

Patients indicating level of pain they were having using a VAS scale. The scale is a 100mm line drawn going from 0-100 (0=no pain; 100=worse pain)

次要结局

  • The Specific Quality of Life Score Using the CIVIQ Score(Up to 6 months)
  • The Cost of the Intervention(1 week)
  • The Specific Quality of Life Score Using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) Score(Up to 6 months)
  • The Generic Quality of Life Score Using the EQ-5D Score(Up to 6 months)
  • The Clinical Score Using the Venous Clinical Severity Score(Up to 6 months)
  • The Degree of Bruising and Phlebitis(Up to 6 months)
  • The Number of Days After Treatment That Patients Were Compliant With the Intervention(Up to 3 weeks)
  • The Time Taken to Return to Work and Normal Activities(1 month)
  • Occlusion Rates at 6 Months(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验