Development and Testing of BAJJAJJA: An Intervention to Promote Economic Empowerment and Health of Grandmothers Who Provide Primary Care for Grandchildren in Uganda
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 24
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Social Support: Duke-University of North Carolina Functional Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-UNC FSSQ)
研究概览
简要总结
Background:
There are an estimated 163 million children worldwide who are under the care of their grandparents or other relatives. In Uganda, social determinants of health (i.e., poverty, wars, and maternal and perinatal conditions) threaten the middle generation (age 15-49) and leave older adults, especially grandmothers (Bajjajja), to become the safety net. Yet, in this region, knowledge about effective interventions that support the health and wellbeing of these GMCs is limited to nonexistent. As such, Dr. Matovu proposes to refine, adapt, and test her BAJJAJJA intervention that she developed.
Specific Aims:
Dr. Matovu will achieve this goal through three Specific Aims:
- Refine and adapt the BAJJAJJA intervention components through a collaborative and iterative feedback process with a diverse community group of 18 members;
- Test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the BAJJAJJA intervention in improving economic and health outcomes among 24 Ugandan GMCs; and
- Explore the barriers and facilitators to (3a) maintenance of the BAJJAJJA individual intervention benefits and (3b) sustainability of the income generating activity at 6 months post-intervention.
This innovative study will utilize a community-engaged approach that emphasizes the meaningful involvement of community partners to develop an intervention that targets GMCs. Her outcomes will support her future efficacy clinical trial to test a novel multi-component and community-engaged BAJJAJJA intervention to promote the mental, physical, and economic wellbeing of GMCs.
详细描述
SIGNIFICANCE Caring for children is complex in the best of circumstances. Grandparents take on primary caregiving responsibility when parents are unavailable or unable to rear their children. In sub-Saharan Africa, prevailing reasons for grandparent-caregiving include parental illness/death due to AIDS and other infectious diseases and socioeconomic factors such as chronic poverty.1-8 Although sub-Saharan Africa has seen reductions in new HIV infections compared to other regions, it remains the most affected worldwide. Of the estimated 13.4 million orphans created by the HIV/AIDS epidemic, more than 80% live in sub-Saharan Africa,9 and grandmothers often step forward to care for orphaned children.1-8,10 Older grandmothers (bajjajja), some of whom are living with HIV, bear the additional responsibility of caring for children who may be infected with HIV and/or have other special needs. Dr. Matovu's research will focus on Uganda, a country with a long history of HIV cases,11 and older grandmother-caregivers (GMCs) who often become the primary caregivers for their grandchildren. Without the safety net provided by GMCs, Uganda could face a public health crisis.
Grandparent-Caregiving Phenomenon:
The plight of GMCs has been documented by exploratory studies in Uganda as it relates to social determinants of health (SDoH) such as wars and the early years of the HIV epidemic.1-9 Many of these studies highlighted the challenges and few rewards of caregiving as experienced by Ugandan GMCs. However, these studies did not explore GMCs' perception of their role, the intricate familial restructuring or decision-making involved in caring for grandchildren affected by HIV/AIDS, or the impact of caregiving on mental and physical health of these older adults. These gaps motivated me to explore the grandparent-caregiving phenomenon as experienced by older Ugandan grandparents. From a qualitative study of 32 Ugandan GMCs, the PI developed the GRAndparent-CarEgiving (GRACE) model, a substantive theory12,13 that offers a theoretical explanation of the caregiving experience and role as reported by GMCs (publication in review). The findings from this foundational research begun to fill the prior gaps in knowledge and further established an understanding of key concepts, such as symptom experience,14 loss,15 perceived rewards, stress, and coping16,17 as experienced by GMCs. Alongside corroborating positive aspects of caregiving from prior studies,8,9 the foundational research revealed overwhelming caregiver stress. Grandparents reported physical, emotional, social, and, most prevalently, financial burdens that impacted their abilities to adequately provide for themselves, their grandchildren, and other family members, such as aging spouses and parents.
The proposed intervention will target GMCs' primary support needs: financial and health-related wellbeing. A handful of descriptive caregiver studies in sub-Saharan Africa explored the impact of caregiving on younger family caregivers (~39 to 48 years of age) and reported extensive caregiver burden, poor nutritional status, and potential adverse health outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease and depression.18,19 The paucity of research in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Uganda, contrasts with the extensive research in North America, showing the negative impact of caregiving on the physical and mental health of GMCs.20-40 Additionally, there are a few intervention studies in Central and East African that focus on women's empowerment41,42 and AIDS orphans and their families.43-46 While highlighting the challenges experienced by the younger caregiver cohort and orphans, findings from these studies may not directly translate to the specific needs of an aging population of GMCs in Uganda. Grandmothers are particularly vulnerable to age-related poor health outcomes and chronic socioeconomic stressors that may be further exacerbated by caregiving.24, 29,32 These women are often responsible for the wellbeing of their families, especially when diseases and other SDoH negatively impact the productive and reproductive age group (15-49).17 Therefore, compromised health among GMCs can potentially affect a whole family, leading to increased adverse social, health, and economic community outcomes. The next logical step in advancing this research among GMCs is to refine and adapt an innovative and multi-component intervention, BAJJAJJA: Building A Joint Action for JaJJAs, and test its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. The PI proposed research will be the first known study to test a multi- component intervention geared toward the unique needs of GMCs in Uganda.
Scientific Premise and Theoretical Underpinnings: the intervention is informed by Pearlin's47 interpretation of the stress process and Lazarus and Folkman's transactional model of stress and coping.48 The PI's preliminary research enabled me to contextualize the application of these two theories to the specific stressors experienced by older GMCs in Uganda.14-17,49 It is essential that the investigators address these stressors through culturally appropriate interventions. The proposed intervention will, therefore, focus on two of the most salient stressors: financial and health challenges. The BAJJAJJA intervention is comprised of two components: (1) an income generating activity (IGA) and (2) nurse-led health coaching. These intervention components align with two of the social support typologies proposed by House:50 instrumental/tangible (earnings from the IGA) and informational (health coaching). Providing social support in these categories has potential to reduce the effects of stress and improve the financial and health outcomes of GMCs.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
- •Female, aged 50 years or older (reflecting the post-reproductive age range in Uganda)
- •Luganda-speaking (commonly spoken language).
- •Primary caregiver of at least one minor grandchild (under 18 years) for more than six months
- •Able to independently perform activities of daily living (e.g., cooking, bathing)
排除标准
- •Participants will be excluded if they:
- •Are cohabitating with their adult children
- •Are grandmothers under the age of 50
研究组 & 干预措施
Economic Empowerment and Health Promotion
In this study, all 24 participants will engage in two intervention components constituting of an income generating activity (e.g. poultry farming) and health coaching (facilitated by visiting nurses).
干预措施: The BAJJAJJA intervention (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Social Support: Duke-University of North Carolina Functional Social Support Questionnaire (Duke-UNC FSSQ)
时间窗: Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months)
The Duke-University of North Carolina Functional Social Support Questionnaire measures a person's satisfaction with the functional aspects of social support. Scoring Range: The Duke-University of North Carolina Functional Social Support Questionnaire is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Much less than I would like) to 5 (As much as I would like). The total score ranges from 8 to 40. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a better outcome, meaning greater perceived functional social support. Lower scores suggest less perceived support.
Mental and Physical Health: Short Form Health Survey - 12-Item Version (SF-12)
时间窗: Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months)
12 item self-reported outcome measure that assesses the impact of health on an individuals everyday life. It addresses 8 domains of health, including physical functioning, physical role, pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional role and mental health. Scoring Range: Physical Component Summary (PCS) \& Mental Component Summary (MCS): typically ranges from 0 to 100 Interpretation: Higher scores on both the PCS and MCS indicate better health outcomes (better physical functioning and mental well-being).
Caregiver Strain: Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
时间窗: Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months)
13 questions to measure caregiver strain in at least one of the following domains: Financial, Physical, Psychological, Social, and Personal. Scoring Range: The standard 22-item version of the Zarit Burden Interview has a total score range from 0 to 88. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Nearly Always). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a worse outcome, meaning greater caregiver strain or burden. Lower scores suggest less perceived burden.
Self-Efficacy: Short Form of General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE-6)
时间窗: Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months)
6-item Short Form of General Self-Efficacy Scale assesses a sense of perceived self-efficacy aimed to predict coping and adaptation with stress Scoring Range: The 6-item short form has a total score range from 6 to 30. Each item is typically rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Not at all true) to 5 (Exactly true). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a better outcome, meaning greater self-efficacy. Lower scores suggest less confidence in one's ability to cope with challenges or exert control over life circumstances.
Food Insecurity & Household Income: Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS)
时间窗: Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months)
9-item instrument that addresses 3 domains of core experiences: uncertainty or anxiety about food supply; insufficient food quality; and insufficient food intake and its physical consequences Scoring Range: The Household Food Insecurity Access Scale is scored from 0 to 3 based on frequency of occurrence: 0 = Never 1. = Rarely (once or twice in the past four weeks) 2. = Sometimes (three to ten times) 3. = Often (more than ten times) Total score range: 0 to 27 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a worse outcome, meaning greater household food insecurity. Lower scores reflect better food access and food security.
Economic Empowerment: Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI)
时间窗: Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months)
12 indicators including, autonomy in income, self-efficacy, ownership of land and other assets, access to and decisions on credit, control over use of income, work balance, group membership, etc. Scoring Range: The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index score ranges from 0 to 1. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a better outcome, meaning greater empowerment in agriculture-related domains. A score of 1.0 represents full empowerment, while a score closer to 0 indicates low empowerment.
Readiness to Change: Readiness to Change Questionnaire (RCQ)
时间窗: Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months)
2-item to assess where individuals are in the cycle of change to inform goal setting, actions, and determine the best strategies. Scoring Range: The Readiness to Change Questionnaire is divided into three response subscales: Precontemplation, Contemplation. Action. Each item is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 Scoring Range: The Readiness to Change Questionnaire is divided into three response subscales: Precontemplation, Contemplation. Action. Each item is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Interpretation: There is no single total score for the Readiness to Change Questionnaire; rather, the highest subscale score indicates the participant's current stage of readiness to change. Higher scores in the "Action" subscale suggest a better outcome, reflecting greater readiness to change. Higher scores in the Precontemplation stage indicate lower readiness (worse outcome in terms of behavior change).Contemplation is a middle stage of ambivalence or consideration.
次要结局
- Feasibility & Acceptability: Demographic and Clinical Data Form(Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months))
- Sustainability & Maintenance: Semi-structured & structured questionnaires(Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months))
- Fidelity Monitoring(Baseline, 12-months, and 6- months post-intervention (18- months))
研究者
Schola Matovu, PhD, RN
Assistant Professor
University of Utah
