跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01723436
NCT01723436已完成不适用

Pilot Study of Repeated Decision Making in Surrogates

University of Pennsylvania2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 132 人开始时间: 2012年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
132
试验地点
2
主要终点
Stroop Test Score

研究概览

简要总结

Decision making capacity fatigues after repeated decisions similar to skeletal muscle. The result is decision fatigue, in which subsequent decisions are altered toward the status quo. Surrogates are at risk for decision fatigue yet it has not been studied. We propose a randomized study in the outpatient setting in surrogates and patients at high risk for needing to make complex decisions, in an effort to determine the impact of decision fatigue on surrogate self-control and subsequent choices.

详细描述

Just as skeletal muscle fatigues after repeated use, decision-making capacity fatigues when repeated choices are made. This phenomenon, in which people experience diminished concentration and willpower after repeated decision-making, is termed decision fatigue. People experiencing decision fatigue are more likely to bias subsequent choices toward the status quo. By choosing the status quo, the decision-maker reserves the option to make an alternate choice at a later time, thereby preserving possibilities. Patients and their surrogates often make complex medical decisions for which they may have little experience. Although clearly at high risk, decision fatigue has not been studied in this population. To elucidate these questions, we propose a four-arm study of surrogates and patients in a population at high risk for making complex decisions. Surrogates will be randomly assigned to varied levels of decision making effort to assess for the development of resultant decision fatigue and whether it alters subsequent decisions.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients must have one of the following diagnoses: aplastic anemia, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, stage IIIB or IV lung cancer, mesothelioma and/or stage IIIB or IV gastrointestinal cancer (pancreatic, biliary, esophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, colon), stage IV melanoma.
  • Patients must have at least one surrogate at their clinic visit who is willing to enroll with them as a pair to be included.
  • Surrogates are eligible if an eligible patient identifies them as as a surrogate and both consent for the study.
  • All participants must be over the age 18
  • All participants must be fluent in English

排除标准

  • Patients and surrogates will be excluded if they are illiterate or have a medical condition known to alter Stroop performance. These include individuals who are visually impaired such that they cannot read a computer screen, blind or colorblind, patients given sedating medications during their appointment and individuals with past medical history of cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizure disorder, dementia or traumatic head injury with loss of consciousness.
  • Patients will be ineligible if they have either tracheostomy or are currently on hemodialysis as these would significantly alter responses to the mechanical ventilation hypothetical scenario and the hypothetical life sustaining therapy question.
  • Surrogates and patients are ineligible if their paired participant is excluded for any of the above reasons.

结局指标

主要结局

Stroop Test Score

时间窗: Approximately 15 minutes

Measurement of score will be done at the conclusion of instrument completion. The Stroop test is a standard measure of self control that requires three tasks. The last task is the most difficult where the participant must suppress the urge to read the word which is the easier task and instead say the color it is printed in. Standard scoring is the number correct in the Word trial minus the Color-Word trials. This data will be collected immediately following completion.

次要结局

  • Evidence of status quo bias(Approximately 10 minutes)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Scott Halpern

Assistant Professor of Medicine, Epidemiology, Health Policy and Medical Ethics

University of Pennsylvania

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验