Implementation of Home-Based Palliative Care in Limited Resource Settings
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 112
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Palliative Care Outcomes (POS Total Scores)
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this pragmatic clinical trial is to test and evaluate a home-based palliative care intervention for utilizing community health workers to facilitate the delivery of palliative care to cancer patients in rural India. The study builds upon use of the World Health Organization-endorsed "Palliative Care Toolkit," which provides a comprehensive suite of evidence-based materials for delivering palliative care in limited resource settings. For the intervention, two specific aims will be addressed to evaluate: 1) implementation of the intervention within the context of the RE-AIM Framework and 2) outcomes of this intervention to determine its relative effects compared to a standard control group on patients' palliative care needs, symptom burden, quality of life (QOL) and experience with care.
详细描述
This pragmatic clinical trial is a collaboration between the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)and Tata Medical Center (TMC), a cancer center in Kolkata, India. The study has two parts: a) Implementation of a Pal-Care intervention as compared to control/no intervention b) Qualitative post-intervention evaluation.
The part a) of the study is conducted at Tata Medical Center (TMC) in Kolkata, India, under the supervision of the site PI, Dr. Gaurav Kumar. All participants will be recruited from among the TMC patients who are referred to cancer palliative care and will be grouped to the "Control" or "Pal-Care" intervention groups. This part of the study will compare an intervention group of patients who will receive home-based palliative services (Pal-Care)from community health workers (CHWs) vs. a control group of patients who will receive cancer-center based palliative services. This intervention implementation part of the study is approved by TMC Ethics Board and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), approval letter on file with MUSC IRB. MUSC relies on TMC IRB for this part and the ICF document is approved by the TMC Ethics Board in India.
The part b) of the study (under purview of MUSC IRB) involves post-intervention qualitative interviews. MUSC research team will evaluate the implementation and effect of the Pal-Care intervention to deliver CHW navigated home-based palliative care for rural cancer patients in India. The participants of this part of the study will also be from India and include stakeholders, representing all Pal-Care clinical team members and CHWs and patients/caregivers who participated in the Pal-Care intervention. This part has a waiver of signed consent.
The RE-AIM framework guides our evaluation plan to measure the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Pal-Care intervention. Diverse data sources will be used to evaluate the intervention within the REAIM Framework.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 85 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Adults ages 18 years and over, any cancer type, late state cancer, residence in 24 Parganas Region, West Bengal, India, physician documentation in medical record that patient is to receive palliative care, patient willingness to participate in data collection.
排除标准
- •Prisoner; diagnoses of substance addiction (illicit drugs), Mentally unstable or having moderate to severe mental health issue or incapable of decision making, Unable to speak or communicate with ease
结局指标
主要结局
Palliative Care Outcomes (POS Total Scores)
时间窗: 6-month
Multidimensional palliative care outcomes will be measured with Palliative Care Outcomes (POS) Scale that measures physical and psychological symptoms; spiritual, practical and emotional concerns; and psychosocial needs of patient/family. The overall POS scale included 10 items, it is a 5-point Likert scale, scored from 0 to 4, with a total summed score ranging from 0-40. A score of 0 indicates that the particular issue is not a problem at all and a score of 4 indicates that the issue is an overwhelming burden/concern for the patient. The higher the total score, the worser the palliative care outcomes are.
Average Score for Quality of Life (QOL) Physical Domain
时间窗: Week 24
Quality of Life will be will be assessed with the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF(WHO-Quality of life-BREFF) Scale that addresses 4 QOL domains (physical, psychological, social relationships and environment. The Quality of Life (QOL) Physical Domain scale included 7 items, it is a 5-point Likert scale, scored from 0 to 4, summed over the 7 domain items multiplied by 4, transformed to a 0-100 scale using the formula (score-4)x(100/16). A score of 0 indicates the poorest level for physical QOL and a score of 4 indicates that the highest level of physical QOL for the patient. Higher total score indicates better physical QOL for the patient.
Average Score for Quality of Life (QOL) Psychological Domain
时间窗: Week 24
Quality of Life will be will be assessed with the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF(WHO-Quality of life-BREFF) Scale that addresses 4 QOL domains (physical, psychological, social relationships and environment. The Quality of Life (QOL) Psychological Domain scale included 6 items, it is a 5-point Likert scale, scored from 0 to 4, summed over the 6 domain items multiplied by 4, transformed to a 0-100 scale using the formula (score-4)x(100/16). A score of 0 indicates the poorest level for psychological QOL and a score of 4 indicates that the highest level of psychological QOL for the patient. Higher total score indicates better psychological QOL for the patient.
Total Score for Quality of Life (QOL) Social Domain
时间窗: 6 months
Quality of Life will be will be assessed with the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF(WHO-Quality of life-BREFF) Scale that addresses 4 QOL domains (physical, psychological, social relationships and environment. The Quality of Life (QOL) Social Domain scale included 3 items, it is a 5-point Likert scale, scored from 0 to 4, summed over the 3 domain items multiplied by 4, transformed to a 0-100 scale using the formula (score-4)x(100/16). A score of 0 indicates the poorest level for social QOL and a score of 4 indicates that the highest level of social QOL for the patient. Higher total score indicates better social QOL for the patient.
Total Score for Quality of Life (QOL) Environment Domain
时间窗: 6 Months
Quality of Life will be will be assessed with the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF(WHO-Quality of life-BREFF) Scale that addresses 4 QOL domains (physical, psychological, social relationships and environment. The Quality of Life (QOL) Environmental Domain scale included 8 items, it is a 5-point Likert scale, scored from 0 to 4, summed over the 8 domain items multiplied by 4, transformed to a 0-100 scale using the formula (score-4)x(100/16). A score of 0 indicates the poorest level for environmental QOL and a score of 4 indicates that the highest level of environmental QOL for the patient. Higher total score indicates better environmental QOL for the patient.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Suparna Qanungo
Associate Professor
Medical University of South Carolina