跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07673406
NCT07673406进行中(未招募)不适用

A Study of the Efficacy of Surgical Methods When Using Prolene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women

Azerbaijan Medical University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2022年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
36
试验地点
1
主要终点
Postoperative rectal prolapse recurrence

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this clinical trial was to compare two surgical techniques in female patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The main questions it aimed to answer were:

  1. Does modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization improve postoperative anatomical outcomes compared with conventional Wells rectopexy?
  2. Does modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization improve postoperative functional outcomes compared with conventional Wells rectopexy?

Researchers compared modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization with conventional Wells rectopexy to assess postoperative recurrence, complications, anorectal manometry, defecography findings, and pelvic floor symptom scores. Participants underwent one of the assigned surgical procedures and were followed after surgery with clinical assessment and pelvic floor function testing.

详细描述

This is a prospective randomized comparative study conducted at Azerbaijan Medical University. Female patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse are assigned to modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization or conventional Wells rectopexy. Participants are followed for postoperative anatomical and functional outcomes, including recurrence, complications, anorectal manometry findings, defecography findings, and pelvic floor symptom scores.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Not informed

入排标准

年龄范围
47 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Female patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse Patients scheduled for surgical treatment with modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization Ability to complete postoperative follow-up assessments

排除标准

  • Male patients Patients without full-thickness rectal prolapse Contraindication to surgery or anesthesia Severe uncontrolled medical condition that could interfere with participation or follow-up

研究组 & 干预措施

Arm Title: Modified rectosacrouteropexy

Experimental

Participants undergo modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

干预措施: Modified rectosacrouteropexy (Procedure)

Arm Title: Wells rectopexy

Active Comparator

Participants undergo conventional Wells rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse

干预措施: Wells rectopexy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Postoperative rectal prolapse recurrence

时间窗: Up to 24 months after surgery

Recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse after surgery, assessed during postoperative follow-up

次要结局

  • Postoperative complications(Up to 24 months after surgery)

研究者

发起方
Azerbaijan Medical University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mahira Amirova

Assoc.Prof

Azerbaijan Medical University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验