A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of the South China Collaborative Group Protocol for the Treatment of Hepatoblastoma in Children and Adolescents
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- PFS
研究概览
简要总结
Hepatoblastoma is the most common malignant liver tumor in infants and preschool children, comprising 65% of pediatric liver malignancies in those under 15, with its incidence on the rise in recent years [1]. Standard therapy combines surgical resection and chemotherapy: early-stage patients boast a survival rate over 90%, yet high-risk cases only reach around 40%, highlighting unmet treatment needs.
Notably, there is no universal definition for high-risk hepatoblastoma. The U.S. COG (AHEP0731) categorizes it as stage 4 disease, AFP <100ng/ml at diagnosis (any stage), or small cell undifferentiated histology; conversely, SIOP includes factors like major vascular invasion (inferior vena cava/portal vein), intra-abdominal extrahepatic spread, distant metastasis, AFP <100ng/ml, or tumor rupture, regardless of PRETEXT stage. To improve outcomes, international teams have tested intensified chemotherapy: Europe's SIOPEL reported that escalated cisplatin-doxorubicin regimens lifted high-risk patients' 3-year overall survival to over 80% [2], though with heightened toxicity. Similarly, Germany's IPA (ifosfamide-cisplatin-doxorubicin) and Japan's ITEC (ifosfamide-doxorubicin-carboplatin-VP-16) regimens delivered significant survival benefits but also amplified side effects [3,4].
Against this backdrop, the Guangdong Anti-Cancer Association's Pediatric Oncology Committee, led by Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and involving 15 hospitals, is launching a multicenter prospective trial to identify optimal chemotherapy regimens for Chinese hepatoblastoma children.
Parallelly, liquid biopsy has become an oncology research priority, offering four core advantages over tissue biopsy: non-invasiveness (peripheral blood sampling avoids tumor seeding), real-time genetic/progression monitoring (eliminating repeated invasive procedures), comprehensive molecular profiling (overcoming intratumoral heterogeneity), and high accuracy (capturing primary tumor-derived data). Given hepatoblastoma's propensity for early distant metastasis and 30-40% advanced-stage survival (with limited late-stage chemo efficacy), the Nano-5hmC-Seal cfDNA epigenetic profiling method holds promise as a novel biomarker for early diagnosis, treatment prediction, recurrence monitoring, and prognosis assessment in this disease.
详细描述
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the Guangdong Anti-Cancer Association's Pediatric Oncology Committee (15 participating hospitals) is launching a multicenter prospective trial to optimize chemotherapy for Chinese patients.
Liquid biopsy, with advantages of non-invasiveness, real-time monitoring, comprehensive profiling, and high accuracy, is an oncology priority. Given hepatoblastoma's early metastasis and poor advanced-stage outcomes (30-40% survival), Nano-5hmC-Seal cfDNA epigenetic profiling is a promising biomarker for diagnosis, treatment prediction, recurrence monitoring, and prognosis.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- — 至 18 Years(Child, Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with primary hepatoblastoma confirmed by pathology.
- •The age of the subjects was less than 18 years old. ③ Obtain the informed consent from the guardians and sign the informed consent form
排除标准
- •Recurrent hepatoblastoma or other malignant tumor.
- •Age> 18 years old. ③ Patients with other tumors and received chemotherapy and abdominal radiotherapy.
- •Heart, brain and kidney failure patients.
研究组 & 干预措施
Arm 1: Very low-risk group
The study used CHIC staging to stage hepatoblastoma
干预措施: Very low-risk group (Drug)
Arm 1: Very low-risk group
The study used CHIC staging to stage hepatoblastoma
干预措施: 5hmc dynamic monitoring (Other)
Arm 2: low risk group
Patients received 2 to 4 courses of DDP monotherapy followed by elective surgery, then 2 additional courses of DDP monotherapy postoperatively, totaling 4 to 6 treatment cycles.
干预措施: Low-risk group (Drug)
Arm 2: low risk group
Patients received 2 to 4 courses of DDP monotherapy followed by elective surgery, then 2 additional courses of DDP monotherapy postoperatively, totaling 4 to 6 treatment cycles.
干预措施: 5hmc dynamic monitoring (Other)
Arm 3:intermediate risk group
Treatment protocol randomization: Group A received SIOPEL-3 HR chemotherapy for 2-4 cycles followed by elective surgery, with continued chemotherapy for 6 additional cycles postoperatively.
The patients in group B were given C5VD chemotherapy for 2-4 courses and then underwent elective operation.
干预措施: Intermediate-risk group (Drug)
Arm 3:intermediate risk group
Treatment protocol randomization: Group A received SIOPEL-3 HR chemotherapy for 2-4 cycles followed by elective surgery, with continued chemotherapy for 6 additional cycles postoperatively.
The patients in group B were given C5VD chemotherapy for 2-4 courses and then underwent elective operation.
干预措施: 5hmc dynamic monitoring (Other)
Arm 4: High risk group
Surgical resection after 3-5 courses of C-CD+ICE+solanifin chemotherapy
干预措施: High-risk group (Drug)
Arm 4: High risk group
Surgical resection after 3-5 courses of C-CD+ICE+solanifin chemotherapy
干预措施: 5hmc dynamic monitoring (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
PFS
时间窗: PFS is defined as the time interval from the start of treatment until the occurrence of disease progression or death of the patient from any cause, whichever happens first (up to 24 months).
progression of the disease or the death
次要结局
- OS(The assessment of OS will be carried out over an estimated period of up to 24 months.)
- Consistency(The assessment will be carried out over an estimated period of up to 24 months.)
研究者
Yizhuo Zhang
Prof
Sun Yat-sen University
