跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02599051
NCT02599051已完成不适用

Transobturator Versus Single Incision Slings: 1 Year Results of a Randomized Control Trial

Cecilia Calvo0 个研究点目标入组 98 人开始时间: 2008年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
98
主要终点
Objective Stress Urinary Incontinence

研究概览

简要总结

A randomized control trial to compare the efficacy of the single incision mini-sling to the transobturator sling

详细描述

Transobturator slings are one type of sling that has become standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence. However, this procedure involves a total of 3 incisions to perform.

In contrast, single incision slings have been developed to treat stress urinary incontinence by using only one incision.

However, to date the success and complications of these two procedures have not been compared or studied.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with urodynamically proven stress urinary incontinence who were planning on undergoing surgery for treatment.

排除标准

  • Patients with prior incontinence surgery, a urodynamic diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency and mixed incontinence with a predominance of detrusor overactivity were excluded.

结局指标

主要结局

Objective Stress Urinary Incontinence

时间窗: 1 year

The primary outcome was presence of leakage during cough stress test(CST) on examination

次要结局

  • Quality of Life Questionnaire ICIQ(1 year)
  • Subjective Patient Reported Recurrent or Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence(1 year)
  • Quality of Life Questionnaire IIQ-7(1 year)
  • Quality of Life Questionnaire UDI-6(1 year)
  • Number of Participants Who Completed Self- Assessment of Cure(1 year)

研究者

发起方
Cecilia Calvo
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Cecilia Calvo

coordinator

The Cleveland Clinic

相似试验