跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03349112
NCT03349112已完成不适用

The Effect of Lidocaine on Perceived Comfort and Swallowing Pressures During High Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry

University of Wisconsin, Madison2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2015年12月22日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
36
试验地点
2
主要终点
A quantifiable difference of perceived comfort reduction during HRPM with or without lidocaine as assessed through analysis of a visual analog scale.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine whether subjects report a difference in comfort with High Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry (HRPM) conducted following application of lidocaine as an anesthetic as compared to HRPM conducted without anesthetic.

详细描述

High resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) is used for assessing swallowing pressure along the length of the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter. Pressure measurements in the region of the velopharynx, tongue base, and upper esophageal sphincter are obtained by passing a catheter with pressure sensors through the patient's nose and past the upper esophageal sphincter. Patients are presented various volumes of liquid to swallow and potentially asked to perform postural strategies such as a head turn or chin tuck during swallowing while the catheter is in place. Clinically, approximately 90% of patients report various discomfort associated with the procedure. Discomfort can result in patient refusal to participate or an inaccurate picture of a patient's swallowing pressures. Conversely, use of anesthesia can potentially alter swallowing physiology.

Recent studies have studied the effects of lidocaine on penetration/aspiration and subject discomfort during flexible endoscopic evaluations, yet findings are inconclusive or contradictive. Investigators aim to determine whether subjects report a difference in comfort with HRPM conducted following application of lidocaine as an anesthetic as compared to HRPM conducted without anesthetic.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Healthy male and female adults 18-
  • Able to consent for self.

排除标准

  • History of dysphagia.
  • History of previous pharyngeal or esophageal manometry.
  • History of facial fracture or abnormalities precluding passage of catheter through nares.
  • History of esophageal pathology including previous resection or perforation.
  • Known lidocaine allergy or sensitivity

结局指标

主要结局

A quantifiable difference of perceived comfort reduction during HRPM with or without lidocaine as assessed through analysis of a visual analog scale.

时间窗: Assessing the change of the visual analog scale between two procedural study visits. Data will be reported at study completion, an average of 1 year.

Following HRPM without additional lidocaine and following HRPM with additional lidocaine, the subject will be asked to rate their level of comfort during the procedure using a visual analog scale.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验