跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01852032
NCT01852032已完成不适用

Computed Tomography Versus Standard 2D Mammography Versus 3D Tomosynthesis

University of California, Davis2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 23 人开始时间: 2010年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
23
试验地点
2
主要终点
Beta of CT Axial View

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare the imaging performance of an investigational breast computed tomography (CT) scanner, built at UC Davis, with that of an FDA-Approved breast tomosynthesis scanner (capable of producing standard 2-D mammography and 3-D tomosynthesis images), built by Hologic, Incorporated, in a group of patients with suspected breast cancer.

详细描述

The primary aim of this study is the comparison of Beta values of several different CT and Tomosynthesis views (Beta of CT Sagittal View, Beta of CT Coronal View, Beta of CT Axial View, Beta of Tomosynthesis Craniocaudal View, Beta of Tomosynthesis Medial Lateral Oblique View). Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
35 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 35 years of age or older
  • While male patients will not be explicitly excluded, it is expected that all patients in this study will be women
  • Diagnostic findings from prior mammography suspicious for, or highly suggestive of, breast malignancy -BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) categories 4 and 5
  • Scheduled for ultrasound or stereotactic core biopsy
  • Ability to lie still on a table top for up to 10 minutes, longer than the typical breast CT duration.
  • Ability to understand risks, procedures, and benefits involved

排除标准

  • Recent breast biopsy
  • History of breast augmentation implant
  • Pregnant or Positive urine pregnancy test (UPT) or currently breast-feeding
  • History of moderate or severe adverse reaction to iodinated contrast injection
  • Recent serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL
  • History of Diabetes Mellitus
  • Currently taking Glucophage or Glucovance (Metformin)
  • History of chronic asthma
  • History of allergy to iodine
  • Multiple food and/or drug allergy
  • Renal disease
  • History of pulmonary disease, phobia of breath holding, or other condition that could prevent the subject from being able to perform the 16 second breath hold

结局指标

主要结局

Beta of CT Axial View

时间窗: Day 1

frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B. beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).

Beta of CT Coronal View

时间窗: Day 1

frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B. beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).

Beta of Tomosynthesis Craniocaudal View

时间窗: Day 1

frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B. beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).

Beta of CT Sagittal View

时间窗: Day 1

frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B. beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).

Beta of Tomosynthesis Medial Lateral Oblique View

时间窗: Day 1

frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B. beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Computed Tomography Versus Standard 2D Mammography... | 临床试验