跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07071272
NCT07071272招募中不适用

Non-inferiority Study of Mammography With the Contrast Medium (Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography, CEDM) Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance (MRI)

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 216 人开始时间: 2020年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
216
试验地点
1
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy of the CEDM against breast MRI

研究概览

简要总结

The general objective of the study is to verify the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) compared to breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing preoperative staging for breast neoformations that have already been diagnosed and in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

In addition to performing a preoperative breast resonance imaging, which is always performed in these patients, one contrast-enhanced mammography per patient is planned.

In patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which usually undergo MRI examination at the beginning, mid-cycle and at the end of chemotherapy treatment, a CEM will also be acquired same way at the beginning, mid-cycle and at the end of chemotherapy treatment.

The study requires, for the execution of the contrast-enhanced mammography exam, the administration of an iodinated contrast medium that is completely analogous to that used in computed tomography.

详细描述

This is a monocentric, prospective, experimental non-inferiority study evaluating the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM/CEM) compared to Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the preoperative assessment and staging of breast cancer.

MRI, recognized for its high sensitivity and three-dimensional visualization capabilities without ionizing radiation, is often used in specialized centers for detailed staging. However, it suffers from practical limitations including high cost, long exam duration (~7-10 minutes), and cost-effective. Preliminary studies suggest its diagnostic accuracy may be comparable to, or even better than, MRI, especially regarding specificity and lesion size estimation. Furthermore, CEM can be used in patients with contraindications to MRI, including those with pacemakers, cochlear implants, or severe claustrophobia.

The study will enroll approximately 216 patients up to December 2025, divided in tho groups: 108 patients with already confirmed invasive breast cancer undergoing preoperative staging; 108 patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.

CEM and MRI will be performed for all enrolled participants. Histological examination of biopsy or surgical specimens will serve as the reference standard for evaluating diagnostic performance.

The primary outcome is to determine diagnostic accuracy (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) of CEDM versus MRI, using histopathology as the gold standard. A non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 15% is defined. The non-inferiority hypothesis will be tested using paired binary outcomes, and sample size calculations for groups 1 and 2, accounting for dependent diagnostic testing.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •women in pre-hospitalization with already established invasive breast cancer (T1-2)
  • •over the age of 30
  • •with BI-RADS mammography pattern> 1
  • •Written and signed informed consent for research
  • •Negative history of adverse events to the use of iodinated and chelated contrast media of gadolinium
  • •No significant renal impairment (EGFR> 30 mL / min within three months before administration of the iodinated contrast medium)

排除标准

  • •women with breast implants
  • •women under the age of 30
  • •Any contraindication to performing the MRI exam
  • •Women with known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation

研究组 & 干预措施

Patients undergoing preoperative staging and patients undergoing chemotherapy

Experimental

All participants in the group 1 and 2 will undergo a routine clinical MRI followed by CEM during a scheduled visit.

In group 2 (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), patients will also undergo interim imaging with both MRI and CEDM at 3 and 6 months to assess treatment response.

干预措施: breast-MRI and CEM (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy of the CEDM against breast MRI

时间窗: Time Frame: Up to 6 months from baseline imaging (MRI and CEDM)

The primary outcome is to assess diagnostic accuracy (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) of CEDM versus MRI, using histopathology as the gold standard. A non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 15% is defined. The non-inferiority hypothesis will be tested using paired binary outcomes, and sample size calculations for groups 1 and 2 follow the Liu et al. method, accounting for dependent diagnostic testing.

次要结局

  • Inter-observer agreement(At baseline imaging (single time point))
  • Tumor size and regression evaluation (neoadjuvant patients)(Up to 6 months per participant)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验