跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04021147
NCT04021147Unknown不适用

Effect of Brain Training Through Visual Mirror Feedback, Action Observation Training and Motor Imagery on Orofacial Sensorimotor Variables in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Universidad Autonoma de Madrid1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 55 人开始时间: 2019年7月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
55
试验地点
1
主要终点
Lingual muscle endurance

研究概览

简要总结

The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of action observation (AO), visual mirror feedback (VMF), motor imagery (MI) combined with an orofacial exercise program in asymptomatic subjects.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •healthy individuals with no pain
  • •aged between 18 and 65 years
  • •subjects with correct masticatory function and labial and lingual mobility

排除标准

  • •individuals who presented systemic, cardiorespiratory, central nervous system or rheumatic diseases, or those who presented any musculoskeletal or craniocervical pathology
  • •underage individuals
  • •individuals with orofacial pain or temporomandibular disorders at the time of the study; (d) subjects' complaint of toothache or tenderness to percussion.

研究组 & 干预措施

Action Observation

Experimental

干预措施: Exercise plus action observation (Behavioral)

Motor Imagery

Experimental

干预措施: Exercise plus motor imagery (Behavioral)

Visual mirror feedback

Experimental

干预措施: Exercise plus visual mirror feedback (Behavioral)

Orofacial exercise

Active Comparator

干预措施: Exercise (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Lingual muscle endurance

时间窗: Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention

Lingual muscle endurance was assessed using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) (Adams et al. 2015). The measurement of muscular endurance was carried out by placing a plastic bulb with oblong air content on the hard palate, posterior to the central incisor teeth. The participants were asked to elevate the lingual (through anterior and posterior lingual region) to press the instrument with the maximum possible force for 3 seconds, while monitoring the force exerted, quantified in Newtons. Adams et al. (2015) found moderate to strong reliability for anterior (ICC: 0.58-0.77) and posterior (ICC 0.77-0.84) tongue strength.

Pain pressure thresholds (PPTs)

时间窗: Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention

PPT is defined as the minimal amount of pressure where a sense of pressure first changes to pain. The mechanical pressure algometer (Force Ten TM FDX Digital Force Gage) used in this study consisted of a round rubber disk (area, 1 cm2) attached to a pressure (force) gauge. The gauge displays values in kilograms but, because the surface of the rubber tip is 1 cm2, the readings are expressed in kg/cm2. The range of values of the pressure algometer is 0 to 10 kg, with 0.1-kg divisions. The pressure was applied at a rate of 0.31 kg/second (Chesterton et al. 2007). Chesterton et al. (2007) have shown that the reliability of pressure algometry is as high as \[ICC=0.91 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.82-0.97)\].

次要结局

  • Maximal mouth opening (MMO)(Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention)
  • Ability to generate mental motor images(Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention)
  • Lingual extensibility(Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Roy La Touche Arbizu

Principal Investigator

Universidad Autonoma de Madrid

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验