跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02065622
NCT02065622已完成3 期

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Higher Versus Standard Adalimumab Dosing Regimens for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

AbbVie173 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 952 人开始时间: 2014年3月27日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
952
试验地点
173
主要终点
Maintenance Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52

研究概览

简要总结

To evaluate safety and efficacy of two adalimumab dosing regimens for induction and maintenance (standard and higher dosing) in achieving clinical remission in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) for at least 90 days, confirmed by endoscopy during Screening period.
  • Active UC with Mayo Score of 6 to 12 points and endoscopy subscore of 2 to 3 despite concurrent or prior treatment with a full and adequate course, in the opinion of the Investigator, with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants or both. Mayo Score is confirmed by central reader.

排除标准

  • Subject with Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis (IC).
  • Current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon.
  • Subjects with disease limited to the rectum (ulcerative proctitis) during the screening endoscopy.
  • Chronic recurring infections or active tuberculosis (TB).

研究组 & 干预措施

Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-SD

Experimental

Induction Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab regimen of 160 mg at Week 0 followed by 80 mg at Week 2, 40 mg at Week 4, and 40 mg at Week 6.

干预措施: Adalimumab (Drug)

Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-SD

Experimental

Induction Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab regimen of 160 mg at Week 0 followed by 80 mg at Week 2, 40 mg at Week 4, and 40 mg at Week 6.

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-HD

Experimental

Induction Higher Dose: Double-blind adalimumab regimen of 160 mg at Weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3 followed by 40 mg at Week 4, and 40 mg at Week 6.

干预措施: Adalimumab (Drug)

Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-SD

Experimental

Maintenance Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), for 44 weeks.

干预措施: Adalimumab (Drug)

Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-SD

Experimental

Maintenance Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), for 44 weeks.

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-HD

Experimental

Maintenance Higher Dose: Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg every week (ew) for 44 weeks.

干预措施: Adalimumab (Drug)

Maintenance (Main Study): TDM Regimen

Experimental

Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg eow at Week 8 and Week 10, with possible dose adjustments at Weeks 12, 24, and 37 based on criteria assessing blinded adalimumab serum concentration and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) assessments.

干预措施: Adalimumab (Drug)

Maintenance (Main Study): TDM Regimen

Experimental

Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg eow at Week 8 and Week 10, with possible dose adjustments at Weeks 12, 24, and 37 based on criteria assessing blinded adalimumab serum concentration and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) assessments.

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Maintenance Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52

时间窗: Week 52

The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy \[confirmed by a central reader\], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders (per FMS) are defined as participants with a decrease in Full Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore \> 1.

Induction Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per Full Mayo Score (FMS) at Week 8

时间窗: Week 8

The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy \[confirmed by a central reader\], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore \> 1.

次要结局

  • Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 8(Week 8)
  • Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per FMS at Week 8(Week 8)
  • Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 7: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in IBDQ Fatigue Item at Week 8(Week 8)
  • Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 6: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in IBDQ Bowel Symptom Domain at Week 8(Week 8)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Week 8 Responders With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days and With Clinical Remission at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Week 8 Responders With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 6: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 7: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days and With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 8: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With IBDQ Response (Increase of IBDQ ≥ 16 From Baseline) at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Participants With Fecal Calprotectin < 150 mg/kg at Week 8(Week 8)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 9: Percentage of Week 8 Non-Responders With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 10: Percentage of Week 8 Non-Remitters With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 11: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 12: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 13: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Response in IBDQ Bowel Symptom Domain at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 14: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Response in IBDQ Fatigue Item at Week 52(Week 52)
  • Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response (Increase of IBDQ ≥ 16 From Baseline) at Week 8(Week 8)
  • Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8(Week 8)
  • Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52(Week 52)

研究者

发起方
AbbVie
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (173)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two... | 临床试验