跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00932906
NCT00932906Unknown不适用

Comparison of Four Different AED Training Methods in Three Different Age Groups

Doczero0 个研究点目标入组 396 人开始时间: 2008年7月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
396
主要终点
Kruskal-Wallis test

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a prospective, randomized trial that compares the effectiveness and retention of four different training methods for the use of an AED:

A. Traditional instructor based learning;

B. The use of a personal manikin with a DVD training to practice the necessary AED skills;

C. The use of a personal manikin with a DVD training to practice the necessary AED skills and additional scenario training;

D. Watching a 2.5 minutes DVD which shows the use of an AED.

It is hypnotised that there are no differences between these training methods, in which case method D is most efficient to reach large number of people to learn BLS/AED skills.

There are two interesting target groups to reach:

  1. Younger people, as they might give the highest interest after training, as they normally live longer.
  2. Older people as they are member of the most important group in risk and have therefore a higher change of being a witness of cardiac arrest.

As there might be differences in the results between different training methods than can be related to age, each training group is distinguished to three different groups:

  1. 21 years of younger;
  2. between 21 and 50 years;
  3. older than 50 years.

It is hypnotised that there are no differences between younger and older students within each of the four training methods.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
15 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • willing to follow a BLS/AED course up to 2h

排除标准

  • CPR training within the last five years
  • professional health care provider

结局指标

主要结局

Kruskal-Wallis test

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Doczero
申办方类型
Other

相似试验