Comparison of Four Different AED Training Methods in Three Different Age Groups
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 396
- 主要终点
- Kruskal-Wallis test
研究概览
简要总结
This study is a prospective, randomized trial that compares the effectiveness and retention of four different training methods for the use of an AED:
A. Traditional instructor based learning;
B. The use of a personal manikin with a DVD training to practice the necessary AED skills;
C. The use of a personal manikin with a DVD training to practice the necessary AED skills and additional scenario training;
D. Watching a 2.5 minutes DVD which shows the use of an AED.
It is hypnotised that there are no differences between these training methods, in which case method D is most efficient to reach large number of people to learn BLS/AED skills.
There are two interesting target groups to reach:
- Younger people, as they might give the highest interest after training, as they normally live longer.
- Older people as they are member of the most important group in risk and have therefore a higher change of being a witness of cardiac arrest.
As there might be differences in the results between different training methods than can be related to age, each training group is distinguished to three different groups:
- 21 years of younger;
- between 21 and 50 years;
- older than 50 years.
It is hypnotised that there are no differences between younger and older students within each of the four training methods.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 15 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •willing to follow a BLS/AED course up to 2h
排除标准
- •CPR training within the last five years
- •professional health care provider
结局指标
主要结局
Kruskal-Wallis test
时间窗: 6 months
次要结局
未报告次要终点
