Influence of tissue graft substitute in the treatment of gingival recessions
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Multiple adjacent gingival recessions with interproximal attachment lossOral Health
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN16572455
- Lead Sponsor
- Arrow Research Development S
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Ongoing
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients = 18 years old
2. Periodontally and systemically healthy
3. Patients presenting multiple (at least 2) adjacent gingival recessions with interproximal a9achment loss - RT3 gingival recessions from Cairo et al 2011 Classification, including gingival recessions in upper and lower maxilla from premolar to premolar area.
4. Full mouth plaque score and full mouth bleeding score = 20% (measured at four sites per tooth)
5. The patient must be able to perform food oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
1. Contraindications for periodontal surgery or systemically unhealthy
2. Patients pregnant or attempting to get pregnant
3. Uncontrolled periodontal disease
4. Gingival recessions in the molar area
5. Single gingival recession
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Complete coverage of the recession measured using a periodontal probe, intra-oral scanning file (STL) and digital software overlapping different files at 6 and 12 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Esthetic score measured using using numeric values from 0 to 10 at 6 months and 1 year<br>2. Patient-reported postoperative pain measured using a VAS scale at 2 weeks<br>3. Patient satisfaction measured using a VAS scale at 1 year<br>4. Keratinized tissue width (KTW) gain measured in mm using a manual periodontal probe at 6 months and 1 year <br>5. Keratinized tissue thickness (KTT) measured in mm using an intra-oral scanning file (STL) and digital software at 6 months and 1 year<br>6. Professional-reported esthetics measured by a blinded examiner using numeric values from 1 to 5 at 6 months and 1 year