跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01968447
NCT01968447已完成不适用

Effect of Deep Neuromuscular Block and Variations in Arterial PCO2 on the Surgical Rating Scale (SRS), Extubation Conditions and Postoperative Conditions Following Reversal With Sugammadex

Leiden University Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2014年2月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
Surgical Rating Scale

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to study the effect of variations in the arterial CO2 concentration during deep neuromuscular block on the surgical conditions as assessed by the surgical rating scale

详细描述

Surgical conditions in laparoscopic surgery are largely determined by the depth of neuromuscular relaxation during surgery. This is especially true in procedures which are confined to a narrow working field such as retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery (eg. renal and prostatic surgery). In the previous study (BLISS study) deep neuromuscular block (NMB) has shown to provide superior surgical conditions compared to moderate NMB. Moreover, rapid reversal of a deep NMB at the end of surgery was possible with Sugammadex (4mg/kg). The deep NMB did not lead to any delay in extubation time and did not cause any prolongation of stay in the recovery room when the block was reversed with Sugammadex

Rapid, safe and complete reversal of profound NMB blockade was not possible until the discovery of Sugammadex. Sugammadex is a modified γ-cyclodextrin. It was developed to selectively bind free plasma rocuronium, a non-depolarizing steroidal neuromuscular blocking agent. The BLISS study was the first study in which the effect of deep NMB on surgical conditions was assessed. Surgical conditions in this study were scored by one surgeon on a newly applied surgical rating scale which ranges from one to five.

Although the BLISS study showed that a deep NMB provided better surgical conditions than a moderately deep NMB overall, there was a high variability in surgical rating scores. More over, even at the deep NMB, SRS scores of 3 (moderate, but acceptable conditions) were noted. This indicates that surgical conditions are influenced by other factors as well. Involuntary movement of the diaphragm is possibly such a major disturbant of the surgical field. Previous studies have shown a relative resistance to neuromuscular blocking agents of the diaphragm compared to the musclus adductor pollicis on which neuromuscular block is generally monitored. Hence contractions of the diaphragm may occure despite a deep NMB. This may be due to (high) arterial carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, which stimulate the respiratory neuronal pool in the brainstem and consequently activate the phrenic nerve. In normal circumstances, the respiratory centers try to maintain an arterial CO2 pressure of 40 mmHg. With intentional hyperventilation, the arterial CO2 pressure may be lowered to 10-20 mmHg. A low arterial CO2 pressure diminishes the respiratory drive and consequently phrenic nerve activity. This is supported by previous observations which showed increased abdominal muscle relaxation produced by hyperventilation. We therefore designed this study to evaluate the effect of arterial CO2 variation with concurrent deep NMB on the surgical conditions. Arterial CO2 tensions may be altered by adjusting the ventilator settings. Eg. by increasing minute ventilation volume, arterial CO2 concentration will lower. Regular arterial blood samples will be drawn to monitor arterial CO2 concentration.

We hypothesize that a Deep NMB combined with hypocapnia will result in a significant improvement of surgical conditions as rated on the surgical rating scale by one surgeon compared to deep NMB and normocapnia

Additional secondary end-points of the study include the effect of arterial CO2 variation on:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • (i) Patients diagnosed with renal or prostatic disease who are will undergo an elective laparoscopic renal surgical procedure or laparoscopic prostatectomy;
  • (ii) ASA class I-III
  • (iii) > 18 years of age;
  • (iv) Ability to give oral and written informed consent.

排除标准

  • (i) Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function;
  • (ii) Allergies to muscle relaxants, anesthetics or narcotics;
  • (iii) A (family) history of malignant hyperthermia;
  • (iv) Women who are or may be pregnant or are currently breast feeding;
  • (v) Renal insufficiency, as defined by serum creatinine x 2 of normal, or urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/h for at least 6 h. When available, other indices will be taken into account as well such as glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/h and proteinuria (a ratio of 30 mg albumin to 1 g of creatinine).
  • (vi) Previous retroperitoneal surgery at the site of the current surgery.
  • (vii) Body mass index > 35 kg/m2
  • (viii) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD 2-4 or a FEV1 less than 70% predicted or VC less than 70% predicted
  • (ix) chronic pulmonary disease with altered lung physiology (eg. sarcoidosis, cycstic fibrosis, obstructing pulmonary tumors, previous lung surgery)

结局指标

主要结局

Surgical Rating Scale

时间窗: Peroperative

During a procedure, the surgical condition will be scored by one surgeon using a 5-point surgical rating scale. The rating scale is a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 = poor condition to 5 = optimal surgical conditions. The surgeon will score the condition at 15 minute intervals.The values given on the surgical rating scale are averaged and the average value is used in the data analysis.

次要结局

  • Nausea(from the end of surgery untill 2 hours postoperative)
  • Pain Intensity on an 11-point Scale in the Postoperative Period(from the end of surgery untill 2 hours postoperative)
  • Hemodynamics(peroperative)
  • Respiratory Function(from the end of surgery untill 2 hours postoperative)
  • Sedation(from the end of surgery untill 2 hours postoperative)
  • Vomiting(from the end of surgery untill 2 hours postoperative)

研究者

发起方
Leiden University Medical Center
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Albert Dahan

Prof. Dr.

Leiden University Medical Center

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验