跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04970030
NCT04970030Unknown不适用

Comparison Between Mechanical Intracanal (ML) Lithotripsy and Electrohydraulic Intracolangioscopic (EHL) Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Difficult Main Biliary Tract Lithiasis

Azienda Usl di Bologna1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2021年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
ML - EHL comparison

研究概览

简要总结

Difficult gallstones are found in about 10-15% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) performed for choledocholithiasis. There are several options for the treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis including mechanical lithotripsy and peroral cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session

详细描述

Difficult gallstones are found in about 10-15% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) performed for choledocholithiasis. There are several options for the treatment of difficult biliary lithiasis including mechanical lithotripsy and peroral cholangioscopy with electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session.

The secondary objectives of the study are as follows:

  • Within 30 days of the procedure, the effective clearance of the biliary tract will be assessed with CholangioRM (or EUS where MRI is contraindicated). If residual choledocholithiasis is present, patients will be considered as late failures.
  • Comparison of the safety of the treatments under study, defined by the incidence of adverse events during the procedure (e.g. perforation, hemobilia) and in the observation period after the procedure (e.g. cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding).

Patients that can be enrolled:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients with "difficult" biliary tract lithiasis that could not be treated by standard techniques, such as balloon and/or basket catheter under fluoroscopic vision.

排除标准

  • surgically-altered gastrointestinal anatomy
  • any evidence of biliopancreatic malignancy
  • patients under 18 years of age
  • patients in a state of pregnancy or are breastfeeding
  • no informed consent

结局指标

主要结局

ML - EHL comparison

时间窗: 1 day

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treating difficult biliary lithiasis with ML and with EHL. The effectiveness is defined by the complete cleanliness of the biliary tract in a single endoscopic session

次要结局

  • effective clearance of the biliary tract(30 days)
  • Comparison of the safety of the treatments under study(30 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验