跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2026/01/101762
CTRI/2026/01/101762尚未招募不适用

Comparison of The Efficacy of Performing Mask Ventilation by CE Technique and Hook Technique by Undergraduate Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study.

Maulana Azad Medical College1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2026年2月2日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
The expired tidal volume VT (in mL) using the CE mask holding technique and the Hook technique and their comparison

研究概览

简要总结

Mask ventilation MV plays a vital role in effective manual ventilation improving oxygenation and ventilation and buying time until a definitive airway can be secured Of the various techniques that exist for mask holding the most widely recognised is the CE technique Another technique which has been recently described is the Hook technique which involves a chin lift maneuver while securely fitting the mask This has been suggested to be better when compared to the CE Technique for prolonged use with less fatigue and finger discomfort

Our study aims to compare the expired tidal volume Vt received during single rescuer face mask ventilation in a mannequin model while holding the face mask using a standard CE technique or Hook technique among medical undergraduate students who were novices to mask holding

This study will be a randomised Cross Sectional trial After a brief orientation participants will be randomly allocated to Group CH or Group HC In group CH the participants will first hold the mask by the CE technique and then by the hook technique In Group HC the participants will first hold the mask by the hook technique and then by the CE technique with a rest period in between Breaths will be delivered by connecting the mask to a circuit connected to an anaesthesia ventilator to deliver volume controlled ventilation at a tidal volume of 500 ml rate of 10 breaths min and PEEP of 0 cms H2O The primary outcome measure is the mean expired Vt and the secondary outcomes will include the comfortability score and the participants overall preference for one of the techniques

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 24.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Undergraduate MBBS students
  • Studying at Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi
  • No previous training in airway management /mask ventilation.

排除标准

  • Medical students will be excluded if they have any current or past Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certification or if they have had any experience in bag-mask ventilation, such as formal bag mask training in the past.

结局指标

主要结局

The expired tidal volume VT (in mL) using the CE mask holding technique and the Hook technique and their comparison

时间窗: Immediately after performing BMV with each technique on a mannequin, ventilation metrics were recorded; statistical analysis followed complete data collection from all participants.

次要结局

  • To assess the comfortability of mask holding of both techniques & overall preference of the techniques.(Immediately after performing both techniques, participants rated comfort on a 5-point Likert scale & indicated their preference (CE or Hook technique).)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Rahil Singh

Maulana Azad Medical College

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验