Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02069964
NCT02069964
Unknown
Not Applicable

A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study Looking at the Difference in Carotid Intima-medial Thickness Between Irradiated and Unirradiated Carotid Arteries in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentOctober 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Head and Neck Tumours
Sponsor
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The difference in mean carotid IMT at one year after radiotherapy between irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries.
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Some patients with head and neck cancer or benign tumours of the head and neck receive radiotherapy to their neck as part of their treatment. The large arteries in the neck, the carotid arteries, are often included in the area being treated with radiotherapy. There is some evidence to show that radiotherapy to these blood vessels can result in thickening and furring of the artery walls some years after treatment. This thickening may then result in stiffening and narrowing of the artery.

Current research is now aimed towards detecting radiotherapy-related changes to the carotid arteries at an earlier stage and towards using new radiotherapy techniques to avoid treating these blood vessels if possible. The question of whether or not the use of preventive medicines like aspirin and cholesterol-lowering tablets helps to reverse this process is currently unanswered.

The aim of this study is to compare the thickness (intima-medial thickness) of the carotid artery wall over time (a period of 5 years) following radiotherapy to the thickness in carotid arteries that have not received radiotherapy. There are many other causes for thickening of arteries (such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol levels and diabetes) and these may affect the ability to measure the effect of radiotherapy change to the artery wall. In order to address this, it is ideal to look at this process in patients who are having only one side of the neck treated and use the other side as a comparison. The study will also be investigating for earlier signs of radiotherapy-related changes, such as stiffening of the artery wall, inflammation in the artery wall (a very early sign of radiotherapy-related change) and some markers in the blood that may indicate that this process is taking place.

The null hypotheses of this study are:

  • In irradiated carotid arteries, mean intimal-medial thickness at one year following radiotherapy will be the same as in unirradiated arteries.
  • The incidence of carotid artery stenosis will be the same in irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries
  • Arterial wall strain at one year following radiotherapy will be the same in irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries.
  • Microbubble ultrasound will not be able to detect Inflammation in the carotid arteries during radiotherapy as an early marker of atherosclerosis; microbubble ultrasound will not demonstrate at what dose of radiotherapy inflammation begins.
  • Serum biomarker levels will not increase over time from baseline after radiotherapy and won't correlate to IMT and arterial strain.
Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2011
End Date
October 2017
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Be 18 years or older
  • Histologically confirmed cancer or benign tumours of the head and neck area requiring ≥ 50Gy to one side of the neck (conventional or intensity modulated RT)
  • Prior or subsequent neck dissection allowed (irradiated and/or unirradiated side)
  • Be able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with bulky nodal neck disease that may interfere with acquisition of ultrasound images
  • Patients with a prior history of carotid endarterectomy or carotid angioplasty and stenting

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The difference in mean carotid IMT at one year after radiotherapy between irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries.

Time Frame: 1 year

Measured at baseline and 12 months after radiotherapy

Secondary Outcomes

  • The difference in mean carotid IMT at 2 and 5 years after radiotherapy between irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries.(2 and 5 years)
  • The incidence of carotid artery stenosis in irradiated carotid arteries compared to unirradiated carotid arteries.(5 years)
  • The difference in carotid arterial wall strain following radiotherapy between irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries.(5 years)
  • The difference in arterial wall inflammation between irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries and dose-related effects(5 years)
  • The effect of risk-modifying therapy (anti-hypertensives, anti-diabetic medication, HMGCoA reductase inhibitors, smoking cessation) on irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries.(5 years)
  • The change in mean serum biomarker levels after radiotherapy.(1 year)
  • The proportion of patients who develop stroke or TIA.(5 years)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials