Clinical advantages of gradually reducing radius total knee arthroplasty
- Conditions
- Advanced knee osteoarthritis treatmenttotal knee arthroplastygradually reducing radiusmulti-radius femoral componentfunctional outcomes
- Registration Number
- TCTR20221030001
- Lead Sponsor
- Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
- Brief Summary
The KOOS score at 6 months postoperatively showed each subscale of symptom 85 vs 85, pain 87 vs 85, activity of daily living 80 vs 81, sport 70 vs 68, and quality of life 81 vs 83 for GR vs MR). The KOOS at 12 months showed subscale of symptom 90 vs 89, pain 90 vs 88, activity of daily living 84 vs 84, sport 80 vs 78, and quality of life 91 vs 90 for GR vs MR). The GR prosthesis design gave more knee motions than did the MR prostheses (34.67 vs 23.67, p 0.001) at 12 months postoperatively.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
1. Patients with clinical and radiographic diagnosis of severe knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade IV) by one of the arthroplasty consultants
2. Patients who placed on the waiting list for unilateral TKA
1. Revision surgery
2. History of septic or inflammatory arthritis
3. Body mass index (BMI) > 36 kg/m2
4. Severe coronal deformity > 20degrees
5. Unable to ambulate independently preoperatively
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pateint reported outcomes 6 and 12 months The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient based performances 6 and 12 months Performance scores,knee motions 6 and 12 months Degree of knee motion