Thermocool SF Catheter Versus Thermocool Catheter in Isthmus-dependent Atrial Flutter Ablation
- Conditions
- Atrial Flutter
- Interventions
- Device: Atrial flutter porous tip catheterDevice: Atrial flutter irrigated catheter
- Registration Number
- NCT02088489
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Brief Summary
Porous tip catheter use reduces procedure time and RF time in atrial flutter ablation with the same safety.
- Detailed Description
New porous tip catheters appear more effective in atrial fibrillation ablation than conventional irrigated catheter, with the same safety. We could hypothesize porous tip irrigated catheters are more effective than conventional irrigated catheter, reducing procedure time and RF ablation time.We realize a randomized comparison study.
For that, 70 patients with an indication for isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation will be randomized to conventional irrigated catheter ablation or porous tip irrigated catheter ablation. A ECG-Holter examination will be done at 1 month follow up after catheter ablation, 6 and 12 months.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
- All patients undergone to cti-dependent atrial flutter ablation.
- Left atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation
- Femoral venous access not available.
- Anticoagulation not therapeutic in patients at high thrombo-embolic risk
- Other contraindications to radiofrequency ablations: pregnancy, malignancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Atrial flutter, porous tip catheter Atrial flutter porous tip catheter Patients with isthmus dependent atrial flutter, undergone to catheter ablation with Thermocool® SF(Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA) irrigated catheter Atrial flutter, irrigated catheter Atrial flutter irrigated catheter Patients with isthmus dependent atrial flutter, undergone to catheter ablation with Thermocool® (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA) irrigated catheter
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time needed to block cavo-tricuspidal isthmus During ablation procedure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Radiofrequency time. During ablation procedure Total radiofrequency time needed to achieve cavo-tricuspidus isthmus (CTI) block.
Fluoroscopy time. During ablation procedure. Total X-ray time needed to achieve CTI block.
Complications during the procedure. During ablation procedure. Survival free from flutter Up to 12 months after procedure. Proportion of patients not presenting with an atrial flutter recurrence.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain