Prospective, randomised, controlled study comparing Videolaryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubatio
- Conditions
- Intubation traumataT88.4Failed or difficult intubation
- Registration Number
- DRKS00020978
- Lead Sponsor
- Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
Adult patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring general anaesthesia with the need of a double-lumen tube (DLT)
The main exclusion criterion was patients aged less than 18 years. In addition, non-fasting patients, pregnant women and patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, which were indicated for rapid-sequence induction, were excluded from the study. Other exclusion criteria were the following: contraindication to a left or right DLT; contraindication to one-lung ventilation; and an abnormal physical status of the Cervical spine (e.g., after C-spine trauma, Bechterew's disease).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Endpoints were time to intubate, Measurement time in seconds during procedure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subjective symptoms and objective trauma of the oropharynx and supraglottic space. Measurement after surgery and 24 h after surgery with a patients questionnaire and nasal endoscopic follow up.