Comparing the impact of two different designs of dental implants on how stable they are when used in a procedure where they are immediately loaded for function.
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/03/064899
- Lead Sponsor
- Janvi Kalra
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Patients presenting with single missing posterior tooth in mandibular arch.
Patients within the age group of 20-45 years of either sex.
Patients with D2 bone quality (850-1250 Hounsfield Units).
Patients with Insertion Torque value = 30 Ncm at baseline.
Patients with sufficient vertical inter arch space to accommodate the prosthetic component.
Patients having known history of bone disorders (e.g. osteoporosis, osteoarthritis).
Patients having known systemic diseases contraindicated for implant placement.
Patients with a history of smoking.
Patients with a history of drug intake such as immunosuppressive drugs, anticoagulants and anti-cancer drugs three months prior to the study.
Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
Pregnant and lactating women.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method