Group Dynamics Evaluation in ginecOlogic muLtidisciplinary Tumor boarDs
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrollment
- 400
- Locations
- 1
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Study Title Group Dynamics Evaluation in Gynecologic Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards - GOLD Study
Background and Rationale Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards are central to complex oncologic decision-making. In gynecologic oncology, clinical decisions often require the integration of knowledge from different specialties, including surgery, medical oncology, radiology, pathology, radiation oncology, and other relevant disciplines. These teams function not only as groups of specialists but also as collective decision-making systems, where communication, collaboration, information sharing, psychological safety, and group dynamics may influence the quality of clinical discussion and final recommendations.
Study Objective The GOLD Study aims to investigate the decision-making process and group dynamics within ovarian and uterine cancer Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards. The study will assess how communication patterns, collaboration, minority dissent, team cohesion, team learning, task interdependence, collective information processing, individual information processing, and psychological safety contribute to Tumor Board performance.
Study Design This is a single-center, prospective, longitudinal observational study involving physicians participating in ovarian and uterine cancer Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards, either in person or online.
Methods At the end of each Tumor Board meeting, participating physicians will complete an online survey using Microsoft Forms. The questionnaire was developed within a scientific collaboration with the Department of Business and Management of LUISS Guido Carli University and includes validated measurement scales derived from the literature. In addition, data on team composition and participation will be collected for each meeting.
Statistical Analysis Survey data and participation data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, inferential methods, and social network analysis. Network measures such as density and centralization indices will be used to evaluate the structure of interactions and participation over time. Statistical analyses will be performed using Stata, R, and UCINET where appropriate.
Target Population and Sample Size The target population includes physicians involved in the clinical decision-making process during ovarian and uterine cancer Tumor Boards. A total of approximately 400 questionnaires is planned, based on the rule of thumb of at least 10 respondents per questionnaire variable.
Study Duration The expected study duration is six months.
Detailed Description
Study Title Group Dynamics Evaluation in Gynecologic Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards - GOLD Study
Sponsor The study is sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS.
Background and Rationale Teams are commonly defined as stable or dynamic groups of individuals who may participate either temporarily or permanently and who share responsibility for achieving a final outcome. In complex organizational and clinical settings, teams are increasingly regarded as systems capable of developing collective intelligence. This collective intelligence reflects the ability of a group to process information, adapt to changing conditions, and operate effectively in environments characterized by complexity, uncertainty, and high information density.
In oncology, decision-making is often too complex to be managed by a single professional perspective. For this reason, Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards have become an essential model for clinical decision-making. These boards bring together specialists from different departments and disciplines, each contributing distinct knowledge, expertise, clinical experience, and interpretative frameworks.
Gynecologic oncology Tumor Boards, particularly those focused on ovarian and uterine cancers, represent a relevant setting in which to study the role of group dynamics. The quality of discussion, the integration of available information, the degree of participation among members, and the way disagreement is expressed and managed may all affect the final clinical recommendation.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Other
- Time Perspective
- Prospective
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Physicians participating in the clinical decision-making process within ovarian and uterine cancer multidisciplinary tumor board meetings.
- •Participation in the full tumor board session.
- •Participation either in person or online.
- •Representation of at least one relevant specialty or role involved in the clinical decision-making process.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Partial attendance at the ovarian and uterine cancer multidisciplinary tumor board session.
- •Trainees or other attendees not directly involved in the clinical decision-making process.
- •Physicians whose specialty contribution consists of occasional consultation for less than 50% of the study period.
- •Incomplete survey completion.
- •If more than one member represents the same specialty or role, participants with lower participation in the clinical decision-making process may be excluded.
Investigators
FAGOTTI ANNA
Prof.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS