Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03278704
NCT03278704
Terminated
Not Applicable

Effects of Concurrent Resistance Exercise and High-intensity Interval Exercise Training on Skeletal Muscle Adaptations in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

University of Birmingham1 site in 1 country4 target enrollmentDecember 6, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Sponsor
University of Birmingham
Enrollment
4
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in fibre-type specific satellite cell content
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

It is recommended that individuals perform a combination of resistance exercise (RE) and endurance exercise. Lack of time is often cited as a reason for being unable to meet current exercise guidelines. Therefore, combining both forms in one session may be beneficial. However, research continues to elucidate whether interference of adaptive outcomes occurs when RE and endurance exercise are performed concurrently. A proposed interference effect suggests that concurrent training may dampen RE-induced adaptations (e.g., muscle strength and growth) compared to RE only.

The propose of this investigation is to determine the effects of concurrent RE and high-intensity interval training (HIIT), compared to RE only, on muscle health and cardiovascular risk in sedentary, middle-aged (40-65 years) who are overweight/obese with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The investigators will measure the effects on muscle strength, muscle growth, cardiovascular fitness, glycaemic control and markers of cardiovascular risk before and after an 8-week training program. Data will be obtained through the analysis of skeletal muscle samples, blood samples, magnetic resonance imaging, questionnaires and exercise performance tests.It is hypothesized that concurrent RE + HIIT will amplify the exercise-induced muscle growth response, which will result in greater satellite cell content, compared to RE alone. As a result, this will lead to greater skeletal muscle mass and strength after RE + HIIT compared to RE in isolation.

A finding that concurrent resistance training and HIIT does not impede muscle adaptations could offer future strategies to minimize exercise time commitment whilst still maximizing the physiological benefits of both resistance and endurance exercise through a single training session. This may therefore provide an effective exercise strategy in the prevention and/or treatment of T2DM.

Detailed Description

Data analysis will be performed using IBM SPSS statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). All data will be checked for normality and appropriate log transformations applied prior to analysis of variance (ANOVA) for primary and secondary outcomes. Satellite cell content will be compared using a two-way, mixed-model ANOVA with one within (2 levels; pre- and post-training) and one between factor (2 level; exercise group) with significance set at P \< 0.05. Based on a mixed ANOVA with between- and within-participant factors, and previously published data (Babcock et al. 2012), a sample size of 24 participants (12 per group) will provide a power of 84%. This sample size will allow detection of a mean change in satellite cell content of 2.35, assuming standard deviations of the change from pre- to post-training as 2.266 and 1.331 in the two exercise groups. Sample size calculation was performed with an alpha error of 0.05. SamplePower 2.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) software was used to determine sample size. This study will combine data collected at the University of Birmingham with previously collected data from an identical study design performed by a co-investigator (Dr Pugh) in Rome, Italy. The previous study has collected data from 10 participants across both exercise groups (RE, N = 7; RE + HIIT, N = 3). Therefore, it is necessary for the present study to recruit a further 14 participants (RE, N = 5, RE + HIIT, N = 9) in order to achieve a sample size of 24 participants (12 per group). However, based on an assumption of a 25% drop-out rate, the total minimal sample necessary will be 19 participants (RE, N = 7; RE + HIIT, N = 12).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 6, 2017
End Date
July 12, 2018
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • White British/European
  • Aged between 40 and 65 years at the time of screening
  • Have a body mass index (BMI; body weight/height in m2) between 27 and 40 kg/m2
  • Sedentary/untrained for at least 1 year (based on physical activity self-reports of fewer than two sessions of structured exercise per week last \<30 min)
  • T2DM (American Diabetes Association 2014) for more than 1 year
  • Central obesity (defined as waist circumference ≥94 cm for males)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Currently involved in research or have recently (\<6 months) been involved in any research prior to recruitment
  • Any condition limiting or contraindicating physical activity; including diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and coronary or peripheral artery disease
  • Previous myocardial infarction, previous or current angina, shortness of breath, or other symptoms suggestive of heart failure
  • Insulin medication
  • HbA1c more than 75 mmol/mol (9%)
  • Uncontrollable hypertension: systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg
  • Not weight stable for the last three months
  • Smokers (within the last 12 months)
  • Anticoagulant medication, such as warfarin or newer anticoagulant drugs. If participants are on aspirin medication, this would need to be stopped for 3 days prior to and during the day of any biopsy visit unless contraindicated (in which case participants would be excluded).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in fibre-type specific satellite cell content

Time Frame: Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 72 hours after the last training session

Assessed using immunofluorescence microscopy (Pax7-positive cells)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in isometric muscle strength(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 6 days after the last training session)
  • Change in isokinetic muscle strength(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 6 days after the last training session)
  • Change in habitual physical activity levels(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 1 week after the last training session)
  • Change in glycaemic control(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 72 hours after the last training session)
  • Change in exercise enjoyment(After the first and last training session)
  • Change in cardiorespiratory fitness(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 6 days after the last training session)
  • Change in muscle-specific gene expression related to growth adaptations(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 72 hours after the last training session)
  • Change in muscle fibre size(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 72 hours after the last training session)
  • Change in muscle size(Prior to the 8-week training intervention and 48 hours after the last training session)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials