MedPath

Cardioverter DefIbriIlator PlacEMent for priMary Prevention of Sudden cArdiac Death in Patients Older Than 70 Years

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Heart Failure
Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death
Interventions
Device: No ICD implantation
Device: ICD implantation
Registration Number
NCT05373940
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Brief Summary

The primary objective of DILEMMA study is to assess whether the "heart failure optimal therapy alone (HFOT)" strategy is non inferior to the "HFOT+ICD" strategy in terms of overall survival 48 months after randomization, in patients ≥ 70 years with an ICD indication for primary prevention of SCD whether there is an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy or not.

Detailed Description

Rationale Although not recognized by guidelines, there is no available data demonstrating the benefit of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention strategy of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) in elderly. Nevertheless, ICD are currently implanted in this population by extending the results obtained in randomized trials involving younger subjects to the elderly. Finally, if the absence of implantation in the elderly was not inferior to the implantation of such a device, the non-implantation would avoid the device-related complications and decrease the health costs.

Main objective The primary objective of DILEMMA study is to assess whether the "heart failure optimal therapy alone (HFOT)" strategy is non inferior to the "HFOT+ICD" strategy in terms of overall survival 48 months after randomization, in patients ≥ 70 years with an ICD indication for primary prevention of SCD whether there is an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy or not.

Design This is a 2-arm parallel non-inferiority, randomized, open label, multicenter trial. 730 patients will be included over 4 years. Follow up will last 4 years.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
730
Inclusion Criteria
  • ≥70 years old,
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%
  • NYHA class II or III
  • Heart failure HFOT ≥ 3 months
  • Providing informed consent
  • Affiliated to a French Health Insurance system.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Enrolled in or planning to enroll in a conflicting interventional trial
  • Prior unstable sustained ventricular arrhythmia requiring external cardioversion
  • Myocardial infarction within the 40 days
  • Coronary artery intervention (catheter or surgical) within 90 days
  • History of syncope in the previous 6 months
  • Advanced cerebrovascular disease
  • Cognitive impairment leading to the incapacity of consent
  • Any disease other than cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, uremia, liver failure), associated with a likelihood of survival less than 1 year.
  • Patient under tutorship, curatorship, or legal safeguard
  • Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision (prisoner)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Heart failure optimal therapy alone (HFOT)No ICD implantationHeart failure Optimal therapy without implantable cardioverter defibrillator. This group will not undergo an ICD implantation. They will be treated according to the HFOT recommended in the latest guidelines.
Heart failure optimal therapy (HFOT) + Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)ICD implantationOptimal medical therapy + implantable cardioverter defibrillator (HFOT+ICD). This group will undergo an ICD implantation (standard of care), any brand, CE marked, implantable (lifelong), available and reimbursed in the French market (the type and manufacturer at the discretion of the local investigator) in addition to heart failure medical therapy optimization.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall survival48 months after randomization

The primary endpoint will be the overall survival at 48 months after randomization to "HFOT alone" group or "HFOT+ICD" group.

There is an annual follow-up with precise date of the fatal event and specific cause of death adjudicated by the blinded event committee.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cardiovascular mortality48 months after randomization

Rate of cardiovascular mortality assessed by a blinded endpoint committee.

Sudden cardiac death and death from ventricular arrhythmias48 months after randomization

Rate of sudden cardiac death and rate of death from ventricular arrhythmias assessed by a blinded endpoint committee.

Unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes48 months after randomization

Number of unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes

ICD related complications including inappropriate therapies48 months after randomization

Number of ICD related therapies (antitachycardia pacing and shocks), hematoma, infection related to the device, lead dislodgement requiring intervention, pneumothorax and tamponade.

Global quality of life score with 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF36)baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months

Global quality of life score with SF36 (Short form 36 health survey) : the norm data is 0-100, the health related quality of life is increased as the scores are increased.

Health-related quality of life score Euroqol EQ-5D questionnairebaseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months

Health-related quality of life measured by using the European Quality Of Life (EQ-5D) auto-questionnaire. The digits for the five dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The visual analogue scale (VAS) records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical axis from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health)

Patient's global self-assessment of heart failure-related quality of life scorebaseline, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months

The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure will be used to measure the subjects perception of how their heart failure affect their life. Norm data is 0-105 (21 items ; score 0-5), quality of life increases as scores decrease.

The Incremental cost-utility ratio. (ICUR)48 months

The ICUR is calculated by dividing the difference between the average costs of both groups by the difference in mean QALYs gained in both groups. The QALYs will be constructed with the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire and value sets.

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)48 months

The ICER will estimate the cost per additional survivor and is calculated by dividing the difference between the average costs of both groups by the difference in effectiveness (survival) between both groups.

Trial Locations

Locations (19)

Centre Hospitalier d'Aix en provence

🇫🇷

Aix-en-Provence, France

CHU Grenoble Alpes

🇫🇷

La Tronche, France

CHU Strasbourg

🇫🇷

Strasbourg, France

Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière

🇫🇷

Paris, France

CHU Amiens-Picardie-Site sud

🇫🇷

Amiens, France

HôpitalHenri Mondor

🇫🇷

Créteil, France

Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Groupement d'Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille

🇫🇷

Lomme, France

Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Hôpital de Brabois

🇫🇷

Nancy, France

Hôpital de La Timone

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Hôpital Pontchaillou

🇫🇷

Rennes, France

CHU de Nantes

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

CHU Poitiers

🇫🇷

Poitiers, France

CHU de Rouen

🇫🇷

Rouen, France

Hôpital Privé du Confluent

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

Hôpital Trousseau

🇫🇷

Tours, France

Clinique Pasteur

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

🇫🇷

Saint Denis, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath