Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor With Experienced Cochlear Implant Users
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Sponsor
- Cochlear
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 3
- Primary Endpoint
- Patient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Studying usability and gaining feedback of the CP950 Sound Processor in experienced cochlear implant recipients.
Detailed Description
One month protocol, with 2 study visits. The aim of the study to is to gain patient and audiologist feedback on their experience and usability with the device and wireless programming pod.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear
- •Subjects age 12 and older who are cognitively and developmentally able to complete all study related questionnaires as deemed by the principal investigator or delegated staff
- •At least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor
- •Ability to use 2 zinc air batteries with their current program (MAP)
- •Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol for the duration of the trial
- •Exclusion criteria:
- •Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device
- •Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations
- •Implant types not currently supported by the CP950 sound processor (i.e.,N22)
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Patient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
To evaluate usability of the CP950 sound processor using the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire for existing cochlear implant users. Specifically: 1. Patient Reported Hearing Performance 2. Retention \& Comfort 3. Ease of use 4. Use of remote controls 5. Look \& feel 6. Reliability 7. Maintenance \& use