Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04189250
NCT04189250UnknownNot Applicable

Comparison of the Automatized and the Optimized Carbon Monoxid Rebreathing Protocol Determining Hemoglobinmass With Capillary and Venous Blood Sampling

Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen1 site in 1 country31 target enrollmentStarted: January 20, 2020Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
31
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Comparison of two CO rebreathing protocols (aCO and oCO)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is the comparison of two measurement protocols determining hemoglobin mass with two different blood sampling strategies.Both protocols are based on the principle of the carbonmonoxid (CO) rebreathing method. During this measurement, CO is inhaled for a specific time period by the subject in a closed circuit and it is used as a marker to tag circulating hemoglobin.

Detailed Description

The optimized CO rebreathing protocol (oCO) will be compared against the automatized CO rebreathing protocol (aCO). Although theses two protocols using the same method, they show some relevant differences.

The oCO use a 2 minutes rebreathing period in a seated position and capillary blood is taken. The aCO use a 10 minutes rebreathing period in a supine position and venous blood samples are taken.

It is essential to know to what extent the aCO with capillary or venous blood sampling with different rebreathing time and position compared to oCO will influence the provided hemoglobin mass values. It is important to ensure the comparability of formely hemoglobinmass data measured using oCO with hemoglobinmass data measured using aCO for scientific research.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • age 18 or higher
  • healthy (self-reported)
  • women and men

Exclusion Criteria

  • implementation of high altitude training six weeks before and during the study
  • sickness before and during the study
  • blood donation 6 weeks before and during the study
  • pregnancy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison of two CO rebreathing protocols (aCO and oCO)

Time Frame: During data collection (3 months)

The aim is to assess the confidence interval of aCO with a ten min rebreathing period in supine position compared to oCO with a two min seated rebreathing period. The mean difference in hemoglobin mass will be determined, using the aCO and oCO.

Comparison of capillary and venous bloodsampling

Time Frame: During data collection (3 months)

The aim is to compare capillary and venous blood samples collected simultaneously during aCO. The goal is to determine, if the site of blood sampling alters the measured carboxy-hemoglobin and hence the calculated hemoglobin mass. The outcome will be the confidence interval of mean difference measured with capillary and venous blood sampling.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Reliability of aCO and oCO(During data collection (3 months))

Investigators

Sponsor
Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen
Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials