Comparison of Three Methods of Hemoglobin Monitoring
Completed
- Conditions
- Blood Loss
- Registration Number
- NCT00792597
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the hemoglobin results obtained with 1) the HemoCue™, 2) the Masimo SpHb™, and 3) the UCSF Clinical Laboratory. The goal is to determine if these three values differ from each other during various levels of blood loss in the clinical care of patients for spine revision and hip revision surgery.
- Detailed Description
See above
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
- Male or non-pregnant female 18 y/o or older
- American Society of Anesthesiology Classification 1, 2 or 3
- Scheduled to undergo spine or hip revision surgery
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant or nursing
- Patients who in the study investigators clinical judgement would not be suitable for research.
Read More
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method See description below A minimum of three differences recorded during surgery Primary outcome is based on the difference between SpHb (Masimo SpHb™ continuous hemoglobin reading ) - tHb (laboratory hemoglobin determination).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method See description below A minimum of three differences recorded during surgery Secondary outcome is based on the difference between a HemoCue™ derived hemoglobin determination - laboratory hemoglobin determination.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of California San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States