Accuracy of Non-Guided and Guided Implant Surgery in Front and Back Tooth Regio
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/062558
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr. Mehak Khajuria
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 28
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patient with available dental records and CBCT images taken from the implant area.
2. Single or multiple missing tooth space.
3. Presence of any adjacent teeth.
4. Favourable oral hygiene in the examination visit.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Any mucosal disease, such as pemphigus, vulgaris, lichen planus, erythema
multiforme, and others.
2. History of opioid and alcohol use.
3. Heavy smokers = 10 cigarettes /day.
4. Uncontrolled metabolic diseases, debilitating disease, pregnancy and lactating
women.
5. Any symptom suggestive of implant placement failure, like abscess.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Guided surgery placement is more accurate than the Non guided surgery placement with least deviation in the planned and placed implant position. Moreover, there could or could not be a deviation in placement of implants in both anterior and posterior regions. There is expected to be more patient acceptance when it comes to guided implant surgeries.Timepoint: baseline (pre-operative CBCT), 3 months (post operative CBCT)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method placement depends on operators experienceTimepoint: baseline (pre-operative CBCT), 3 months (post-operative CBCT)