Comparison of clinical efficiency of two different functional appliances in treatment of retruded mandible.

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures,

• Registration Number: CTRI/2020/09/027942
• Lead Sponsor: Dr Keerti Kaushik

Brief Summary

This study is basically designed to evaluate the dental and skeletal changes of AdvanSync appliance using CBCT, To evaluate the dental and skeletal changes of Herbst appliance using CBCT and then to compare the dental & skeletal changes of AdvanSync appliance with those treated with Herbst  appliance using CBCT. The results will be evaluated by comparing pre- treatment and post-treatment CBCT within a span of 6 months.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Last Update Posted: 2020-09-17
• Study Start: 2020-09-25

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 15

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients in CVMI staging 2,3,4 2.
• Class II Malocclusion (ANB >4o) 3.
• Horizontal or average growth pattern 4.
• Minimum crowding in dental arch 5.
• Positive Visual Treatment Objective (VTO).

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients above CVMI staging 4 2.
• Class II Malocclusion (ANB <4 degrees) 3.
• Vertical growth pattern 4.
• crowding in dental arch 5.
• Negative Visual Treatment Objective (VTO).

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental changes produced by AdvanSync and Herbst appliance using CBCT.	Six months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

SGT Dental College; 🇮🇳 Gurgaon, HARYANA, India

SGT Dental College

🇮🇳Gurgaon, HARYANA, India

Dr Keerti Kaushik

Principal investigator

7206667232

drkeertikaushik01@gmail.com