Evaluation of the Antibacterial Effect of Ozonated Olive Oil, Propolis, and Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 51
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in microbial count
研究概览
简要总结
Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus are the most common cariogenic microorganisms. Chlorhexidine has been the most widely used antibacterial mouthwash in dentistry. On the other hand, few studies have reported the antibacterial potential of Propolis and Ozonated olive oil as antibacterial agents that can be used as alternatives to Chlorhexidine. This study aims to evaluate and compare the antibacterial effect of Ozonated olive oil, Propolis, and Chlorhexidine on S. mutans and L. acidophilus count in pediatric patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 8 Years 至 12 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •High caries risk patients, according to AAPD guidelines, with visible caries or radiographic penetration into dentin, white spots on smooth surfaces, or recent restorations or missing teeth due to caries.
- •Cooperative children according to Frankl's rating (score 3 & 4)
排除标准
- •Children with any medical illness or oral infection or those who received any type of antibiotic treatment or mouthwash for two weeks before or during the study were excluded
研究组 & 干预措施
Ozonated olive oil mouthwash
干预措施: Ozonated olive oil (Other)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash
干预措施: Chlorhexidine (Other)
Propolis mouthwash
干预措施: Propolis (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Change in microbial count
时间窗: Baseline and after 14 days of treatment
Total bacterial count before and after the intervention was detected. plaque samples were dispersed by vortexing for 30 seconds then 10 fold serially diluted using sterile saline.
Change in plaque accumulation
时间窗: Baseline and after 14 days of treatment
The plaque accumulation was scored for each tooth on its four surfaces.The number of positively scored surfaces is divided by the total number of tooth surfaces evaluated and the result is multiplied by 100 to express the index as a percentage
次要结局
未报告次要终点
