Randomized comparison test of aspiration needles to gastric submucosal tumors about availability and safety of Endoscopic ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA)
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- gastric submucosal tumors
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000008447
- Lead Sponsor
- Yokohama City University, Gastroenterology Division
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
(1) Patients with bleeding tendency (2) Patients under anticoaglant therapy (3) Plt< 30000 (4) Tumor size < 2cm
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and incidence of complication
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
How does JPRN-UMIN000008447 compare 22G and 25G EUS-FNA needles for tissue adequacy and molecular diagnostic yield in gastric submucosal tumors?
What are the complication rates of EUS-FNA using 22G versus 25G needles in gastric submucosal tumor evaluation according to Yokohama City University's trial?
Which histopathological biomarkers are most predictive of EUS-FNA success in gastric submucosal tumors when using different needle gauges?
How do 22G and 25G EUS-FNA needles compare in detecting specific subtypes of gastric submucosal tumors like GISTs or leiomyomas?
What are the long-term diagnostic accuracy outcomes of EUS-FNA needle types in gastric submucosal tumor management as per JPRN-UMIN000008447?