Performance of Toric Hydrogel Lenses Following A Refit With Toric Silicone Hydrogel Lenses for 1 Month
- Conditions
- Ametropia
- Interventions
- Device: methafilcon A toric contact lensesDevice: fanfilcon A toric contact lenses
- Registration Number
- NCT03835221
- Lead Sponsor
- Coopervision, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the clinical performance of habitual wearers of methafilcon A toric lenses after a refit with fanfilcon A toric lenses for 1-month of daily wear.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 43
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
- Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
- Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer
- Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 8.00 (inclusive)-Have no less than -0.75D of astigmatism and no more than -2.25 D in both eyes
- Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
- Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
- Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
- Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses
- Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, >8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so)
- Is willing to comply with the visit schedule
-
Has a Contact Lens (CL) prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses
-
Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.50 D of cylinder in either eye
-
Has a history of not achieving comfortable Contact Lens (CL) wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
-
Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye
-
Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
-
Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear
-
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- Pathological dry eye or associated findings
- Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
- Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
- Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
- Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
- Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
- History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
- Poor personal hygiene
-
Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
-
Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea
-
Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses
-
Has undergone corneal refractive surgery
-
Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description methafilcon A toric / fanfilcon A toric contact lenses methafilcon A toric contact lenses All subjects will first wear methafilcon A toric contact lenses for four (4) weeks of daily wear, then refitted with fanfilcon A toric contact lenses for four (4) weeks of daily wear. methafilcon A toric / fanfilcon A toric contact lenses fanfilcon A toric contact lenses All subjects will first wear methafilcon A toric contact lenses for four (4) weeks of daily wear, then refitted with fanfilcon A toric contact lenses for four (4) weeks of daily wear.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Lens Centration Assessment by the Investigator - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Lens centration was assessed on a 3-point scale (1=optimal centration, 2=decentration acceptable, 3=decentration unacceptable).
Percentage of Participants With Corneal Coverage Assessment by the Investigator - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Corneal coverage was collected on a YES/NO response. Yes - lens covers the cornea, No - lens does not cover the cornea
Post-blink Movement Assessment by the Investigator - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Post-blink movement was assessed on a 0-4 scale (where: 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement,1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement).
Lens Orientation in Primary Position of Gaze Assessment by the Investigator - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Lens orientation was assessed in 5-degree steps with the slit lamp by measuring the amount of mislocation of the axis mark on the lens relative to the 6 o'clock position.
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance by the Investigator - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Overall lens fit acceptance assessed using grade (0-4) 0=Should not be worn, 1=Borderline but unacceptable, 2=Minimal acceptable, early review, 3=Not perfect but okay to dispense, 4=perfect.
Number of Participants With Lens Centration Assessment by the Investigator - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Lens centration was assessed on a 3-point scale (1=optimal centration, 2=decentration acceptable, 3=decentration unacceptable).
Post-blink Movement Assessment by the Investigator - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Post-blink movement was assessed on a 0-4 scale (where: 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement,1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement).
Rotational Recovery Assessment by the Investigator - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Lens rotational recovery was assessed in 5-degree steps 1 minute after the lens was manually rotated 45degrees temporally from the primary gaze position
Rotational Recovery Assessment by the Investigator - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Lens rotational recovery was assessed in 5-degree steps 1 minute after the lens was manually rotated 45degrees temporally from the primary gaze position
Percentage of Participants With Corneal Coverage Assessment by the Investigator - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Corneal coverage was collected on a YES/NO response. Yes - lens covers the cornea, No - lens does not cover the cornea
Lens Orientation in Primary Position of Gaze Assessment by the Investigator - Methalfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Lens orientation was assessed in 5-degree steps with the slit lamp by measuring the amount of mislocation of the axis mark on the lens relative to the 6 o'clock position.
Overall Stability Assessment by the Investigator - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Overall lens stability was assessed using a 0 - 4 scale (where 0 = very poor stability, and 4 = excellent stability).
Overall Stability Assessment by the Investigator - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Overall lens stability was assessed using a 0 - 4 scale (where 0 = very poor stability, and 4 = excellent stability).
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance by the Investigator - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Overall lens fit acceptance assessed using grade (0-4) 0=Should not be worn, 1=Borderline but unacceptable, 2=Minimal acceptable, early review, 3=Not perfect but okay to dispense, 4=perfect.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Average Daily Wearing Time - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Average daily wearing time response by the subject
Average Comfortable Wearing Time - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Average comfortable wearing time - response by the subject
Average Comfortable Wearing Time - Methafilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Average comfortable wearing time - response by the subject
Average Daily Wearing Time - Fanfilcon A Toric Contact Lenses 4 weeks Average daily wearing time response by the subject
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Optometry Clinic, National Autonomous University
🇲🇽Mexico City, Mexico