to compare the beneficial effect of two protocols of MDCT Urography
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: N00-N99- Diseases of the genitourinary system
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/06/043122
- Lead Sponsor
- DEPARTMENT OF RADIODIAGNOSIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND GURU TEG BAHADUR HOSPITA
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All Adult Patient referred for MDCT Urography for any indication by treating clinician.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Any contraindications for CECT
• Pregnant female
• S. creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dl or eGFR less than 45ml/min
• History of documented contrast allergy
• Patient at high risk of developing contrast induced nephropathy.
2. Patients with Complete / high grade obstruction of urinary tract
3. Any contraindication of furosemide
• Patient having anuria
• History of hypersensitivity of furosemide
• Patients having Dehydration
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Number of patients showing various level of distension on dual phase technique with furosemide and triple phase technique with saline infusion exposure as percentage. <br/ ><br>2. Number of patients showing various grades of opacification on dual phase technique with furosemide and triple phase technique. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2hour
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Percentage of patients showing various grades of image quality expressed as percentage. <br/ ><br>2. Radiation dose delivered by two technique expressed as mSv.Timepoint: 2hour