Optimal Management of Women With Wrist Fractures

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Osteoporosis; Osteopenia
• Interventions: Procedure: Educational Material and Reminder

• Registration Number: NCT00226031
• Lead Sponsor: Queen's University

Brief Summary

To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention (reminder and educational material) in improving the evaluation of osteoporosis follow-up care of post-menopausal women with wrist fractures by their primary care physicians. The intervention is directed at improving the gap in continuity of care between emergency/fracture clinics and family physicians, and reducing knowledge gaps.

Detailed Description

Numerous studies have demonstrated that women with wrist fractures have lower bone mineral density. Despite new guidelines for the care of such women, research has shown that they are not generally evaluated for osteoporosis. This care gap exists although it is known that wrist fractures are an important marker for subsequent fractures, such as a hip fracture, which represents a significant socio-economic burden to society.

Comparison: Cluster randomized trial of women and their physicians, both of whom receive educational material and reminder on post fracture osteoporosis evaluation. Comparison is to women and their physicians who receive standard post fracture information. Family practices are randomized to intervention or non-intervention group.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2003-09
• Study First Submitted: 2005-09-22
• Study First Submitted QC: 2005-09-22
• Study First Posted: 2005-09-26
• Primary Completion: 2006-08
• Study Completion: 2007-08
• Status Verified: 2015-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2015-03-10
• Last Update Posted: 2015-03-11

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 270

Inclusion Criteria

1. Postmenopausal women with low trauma distal radius fracture (confirmed by x-ray).
2. Can be taking Didrocal (etidronate), Miacalcin (calcitonin),or hormone replacement therapy .

Exclusion Criteria

1. Women with fractures of the elbow, mid radius, scaphoid, or injury to wrists (without actual fracture).
2. Significant cognitive impairment (which would preclude them from filling out simple questionnaires).
3. Women already taking osteoporosis therapy, ie. either Fosamax (alendronate), Actonel (risedronate), or the selective estrogen receptor modulator, Evista (raloxifene).

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
2	Educational Material and Reminder	Mailed reminder with a summary of osteoporosis screening and treatment guidelines sent to the family physician and a letter and educational package for the women.
1	Educational Material and Reminder	Usual care.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Proportion of women who are prescribed anti-osteoporosis therapy within 6 months of sustaining a forearm fracture.	6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Proportion of women in whom a bone density scan is ordered and the proportion of women who receive counseling advice about osteoporosis from their family physicians.	6 months
Women's knowledge about osteoporosis and fractures (Osteoporosis Knowledge Questionnaire).	6 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Queen's University; 🇨🇦 Kingston, Ontario, Canada