跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/11/098070
CTRI/2025/11/098070尚未招募4 期

Comparison Of Efficacy Among Desflurane Versus Sevoflurane On Post Operative Recovery Profile And Airway Reflexs In Patients Under Going General Anaesthesia

Sardar Patel Medical College Bikaner1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 75 人开始时间: 2025年12月5日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
75
试验地点
1
主要终点
Recovery Profile Evaluation

研究概览

简要总结

For general anaesthesia, volatile anaesthetics like desflurane and sevoflurane are frequently employed due to their predictability, ease of use and medicinal outcomes. Sevoflurane is frequently used to maintain anaesthesia during day care surgery because of its quick emergence and recovery and comparatively reduced blood gas solubility when compared to other volatile anaesthetics. Furthermore, sevoflurane is frequently employed as an induction agent since it does not irritate the airways, resulting in smooth volatile induction. Since desflurane is the least blood gas soluble of the volatile anaesthetics in the market right now, it’s emergence and recovery are more quickly than sevoflurane. Furthermore, emergence and recovery are linked to desflurane use that is more predictable than sevoflurane. To enable quick and simple anaesthetic induction, dependable intra-operative analgesia, and amnesia, novel medications are used in anaesthesia. Inhalational and volatile liquid anaesthetics are gaining popularity because of how simple it is to administer them and because of how consistently they emerge and recover. Contrary to usual inhalational anaesthetics, desflurane and sevoflurane have low blood-gas partition coefficients. If the patient wakes up more quickly, less time will be spent in the post-anaesthesia care unit and with their airway exposed. The quality of emergence and rate of recovery are impacted by the anaesthetic method chosen. The best general anaesthesia should result in a painless induction, the best possible operating conditions, and a speedy recovery with the fewest possible side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and postoperative discomfort. Desflurane and sevoflurane, two inhaled general anaesthetics, are used the most frequently due to their simplicity of administration and consistent intraoperative and recovery characteristics. Rapid recovery minimises postoperative respiratory complications and ensures early, effective coughing. Sevoflurane has quick induction and emergence characteristics and a low blood:gas partition coefficient. Studies comparing desflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) have shown similar rates of: Respiratory illness, with desflurane allowing for faster recovery Gag reflex after emergence, compared with sevoflurane. Some studies reported that desflurane has a consistent and rapid recovery profile in the obese population compared to sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol. Verma et al in their study concluded patients in the three groups had similar impairments in their psychomotor and cognitive functions which recovered at comparable time periods postoperatively. Emergence and early recovery were, however, faster in the desflurane group. Desflurane is known to have a rapid onset and offset of action, thereby making it possible for the anaesthesiologist to control the depth of anaesthesia rapidly. It also provides haemodynamic stability with preservation of tissue perfusion even in face of hypotension; however it is irritating to the airway and therefore is not routinely utilised for inhalational induction. However, studies have shown that controlled desflurane induction along with opioid premedication can be rapid and well tolerated. Sevoflurane administration has been associated with a smooth, rapid loss of consciousness during inhalation induction and a rapid recovery following discontinuation of anaesthesia. In the present study, a comparison of efficacy between desflurane and sevoflurane will be done to assess postoperative recovery characteristics in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA 1 Or 2 Elective surgery requiring General Anaesthesia Written Informed Consent by Patients.

排除标准

  • BMI more than 35 kg/m2 Difficult Intubation Respiratory Diseases Preganacy.

结局指标

主要结局

Recovery Profile Evaluation

时间窗: At Baseline

Airway Reflexes Assessment

时间窗: At Baseline

次要结局

  • Haemodynamics Variables(Post Anaesthesia Complications)

研究者

发起方
Sardar Patel Medical College Bikaner
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Anita Pareek

Sardar Patel Medical College Bikaner, Rajasthan, India

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison between Desflurane Versus Sevoflurane On... | 临床试验