Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Registration Number
- NCT01075620
- Lead Sponsor
- Ewha Womans University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or radiographic differences in non-posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing design versus a posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing designs.
- Detailed Description
Out comes measures were to determine
1. whether the knee and function scores and the radiographic results of the knees with a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis would be better than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
2. whether the patients with a PFC RP knee prosthesis would have a better range of knee motion than those with an LCS RP prosthesis.
3. whether patient satisfaction and preference would be better in the patients having a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis than those of patients having an LCS RP knee prosthesis
4. whether complication rate would be less in the knees with a PFC sigma RP knee prosthesis than in the knees with an LCS RP prosthesis.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 126
- End-stage osteoarthritis of the knee joint requiring total knee arthroplasty with bilateral disease
- Inflammatory disease
- patient with other Lower extremity disease which may affect functional outcome
- Neurologic disease effecting patients lower extremity
- Revision surgery
- Patient not medically cleared for bilateral surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Knee Society knee score at 3 months, 1 year, than annually
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Range of motion at 3 months, 1 year, than annually
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of