Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02769429
NCT02769429
Completed
Not Applicable

Is There a Difference Between Posterior Approach Ultrasound-guided Continuous Interscalene Block (Upper Trunk Block) and Stimulator Guided Continuous Cervical Paravertebral Block (C6 Root Block)?

University of Florida2 sites in 1 country53 target enrollmentSeptember 19, 2016

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Arthroses
Sponsor
University of Florida
Enrollment
53
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Changes between the two groups assessed by sensory testing
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will answer the question whether there is a difference in the effects and complication rates of ultrasound guided continuous interscalene block (CISB) and nerve stimulation-guided continuous cervical paravertebral block (CCPVB). The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences in efficacy and side effects - if any.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized double-blinded study that will compare two commonly used approaches for the continuous blockade of the brachial plexus: the CCPVB, which focusses on the six cervical nerve root (C6 root), and CISB, which focuses on the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. Data of sensory testing, motor strength, shoulder pain, phrenic nerve function, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RNL) function, ipsilateral Horner's syndrome, block time and medication doses used for block placement, will be collected. All observations and measurements will be made by a member of the research team who is unaware of patient allocation to any particular group.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 19, 2016
End Date
September 26, 2018
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The general inclusion will be those adult patients who:
  • are between the ages of 18 and 80 years
  • have an ASA Health Classification of I, II, or III
  • are scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty or rotator cuff repair surgery
  • Patients with a BMI of =to/\< 40 Exclusion
  • The Exclusion criteria will include:
  • Patient refusal to participate in the study or sign informed consent
  • Patients with contraindications to any of the two blocks or allergy to any of the drugs used
  • Patients with shoulder surgery that developed into any other surgery other than total shoulder arthroplasty or rotator cuff repair
  • Patients with a BMI \>40

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes between the two groups assessed by sensory testing

Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 7 days (end of catheter placement)

Sensory abnormalities will be assessed by sensation of cold and dermatomes sensation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Changes between the two groups assessed by recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) function(Change from baseline up to 7 days (end of catheter placement))
  • Changes between the two groups assessed by shoulder pain(Change from baseline up to 7 days (end of catheter placement))
  • Changes between the two groups assessed by motor strength(Change from baseline up to 7 days (end of catheter placement))
  • Changes between the two groups assessed by Phrenic nerve function(Change from baseline up to 7 days (end of catheter placement))
  • Changes between the two groups assessed by development of ipsilateral Horner's syndrome(Change from baseline up to 7 days (end of catheter placement))

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials