Comparison of two different surgical techniques for the treatment of gum diseases
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Chronic Periodontitis
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2016/02/006639
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Anju P
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
1. Chronic periodontitis patients aged 35 yrs or more
2. Interproximal intraosseous periodontal defect with pocket depth 5 mm and radiographic evidence of bone loss 3mm or more with no extension of the defect on the lingual or palatal side as assessed by preoperative bone sounding.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Third molars , Class III mobility & furcation involvement
2. Inadequate endodontic treatment and/or restoration
3. Systemic diseases or conditions that contraindicate periodontal surgery
4. History of periodontal surgery or antibiotic usage within previous six months
5. Not willing to sign an informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gain in clinical attachment level calculated as the distance from the CEJ to the base of the <br/ ><br>gingival sulcus/periodontal pocketTimepoint: at 3 months and 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Probing depth reduction(PDR): Probing pocket depth is distance from the gingival margin to the gingival sulcus which is measured by UNC-15 graduated periodontal probe <br/ ><br>2. Gingival recession reduction(GRR): Gingival recession is measured from the CEJ to the gingival margin <br/ ><br>3. Change in radiographic bone density as assessed by digital radiographs using imaging software.Timepoint: 1. Probing depth reduction(PDR): Probing pocket depth is distance from the gingival margin to the gingival sulcus which is measured by UNC-15 graduated periodontal probe at 3 months and 6 months <br/ ><br>2. Gingival recession reduction(GRR): Gingival recession is measured from the CEJ to the gingival margin at 3 months and 6 months <br/ ><br>3. Change in radiographic bone density as assessed by digital radiographs using imaging software at 6 months