MedPath

Clinical Outcomes of Buffered 1% Lidocaine vs. Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Anesthesia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02708433
Lead Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Brief Summary

Anecdotal data suggest that the buffered form of the local anesthetic is more potent at equal dosages, and a lower dosage of the drug might be used with an effect equal to higher dosage not buffered. Clinical data are needed to confirm these anecdotal data. No data exist comparing buffered local anesthetics at lower drug concentrations to current dosages commonly used in dental and oral surgical procedures

Detailed Description

Specific Aims:

Compare clinical depths of pulpal anesthesia (cold, Electronic Pulp Test) for mandibular molar, and canine teeth at 30 minute intervals post injection for mandibular block anesthesia with buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine as compared to non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Hypotheses:

No differences exist in anesthetic depth for pulpal anesthesia after intraoral injection for mandibular block anesthesia between buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine as compared to non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Study Time Frame: 6 months Month One: Recruit 24 volunteers as subjects. Prepare case-books. Months Two-Three: Clinical Study, Months Four-Five: Analyze data Month Six: Prepare Abstracts, Papers Methods: Blinded, Randomized Clinical Design Recruit subjects with Institutional Review Board approved consent at UNC Subjects will serve as their own controls in a cross-over AB/BA study design which is uniform within sequences, uniform within periods, and balanced Randomized subjects to be injected orally for mandibular block (inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves) alternatively with 4cc of buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine and 4cc non-buffered of 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Assessment: pre, and post-anesthetic administration for pulpal anesthesia with cold, Electronic Pulp Test: Mandibular molar, canine at 30 minute intervals Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-30 years, American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) I Exclusion Criteria Allergy to lidocaine class of anesthetic drugs, Local anesthetic drug past week Current symptoms teeth or oral mucosa. SAS will be used for database management and statistical analysis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
23
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18-30 years, ASA I
Exclusion Criteria
  • Allergy to lidocaine class of anesthetic drugs Local anesthetic drug use in past week Current symptoms teeth or oral mucosa

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Buffered 1% lidocaineLidocaineIn week one each subject would receive either anesthetic (Buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) or (Non-Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) to block the inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves. In week two the alternate anesthetic would be administered. Mandibular molar and canine tested for pulpal anesthesia
Non-Buffered lidocaineLidocaineIn week two each subject would receive the alternate anesthetic (Buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) or (Non-Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) to block the inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves. Mandibular molar and canine tested for pulpal anesthesia
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine AnesthesiaEvery 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total

Subject's Mandibular canine teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electronic Pulp Test for presence of anesthesia as reported by participants "yes" or "no."

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Molar AnesthesiaEvery 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total

Subject's Mandibular first molar teeth tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electric Pulp Test as reported by subjects as a "yes" or "no."

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

UNC School of Dentistry

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath