MedPath

Effect of Portion-control Training on Food Intake

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Feeding Behaviors
Interventions
Other: Meal portion size
Registration Number
NCT02942589
Lead Sponsor
Penn State University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether food intake in response to large portion sizes differs between women who have received portion-control training and women who have not received such training. In a crossover design, women come to the laboratory on four occasions to eat a lunch of seven foods varying in energy density. Across meals, all foods are varied in portion size (100%, 125%, 150%, or 175% of baseline amounts). Food and energy intake is determined for each meal. Participants are from two groups: women who completed a one-year weight-loss trial in which they were trained in portion-control strategies, and women who had not received such training (community controls).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
105
Inclusion Criteria
  • Participant in the Portion-Control Strategies Trial (NCT01474759) OR
  • Community control who regularly eats three meals per day
Exclusion Criteria
  • Score on the Eating Attitudes Test indicating symptoms of disordered eating
  • Score on the Zung or Beck questionnaires indicating symptoms of depression
  • Food allergies or restrictions
  • Dislike for foods served in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
125% PortionsMeal portion sizeMeal portion size: 125%
100% PortionsMeal portion sizeMeal portion size: 100%
175% PortionsMeal portion sizeMeal portion size: 175%
150% PortionsMeal portion sizeMeal portion size: 150%
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in intake by weight across subject groupsWeeks 1, 2, 3, and 4

Weights (grams) of all food consumed

Difference in energy intake across subject groupsWeeks 1, 2, 3, and 4

Calculated energy intake (kcal) based on weight and energy density of food consumed

Difference in energy density consumed across subject groupsWeeks 1, 2, 3, and 4

Energy density (kcal/gram) of all food consumed

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ratings of hunger and satiety across subject groupsWeeks 1, 2, 3, and 4

100-point visual analog scales

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Laboratory for the Study of Human Ingestive Behavior

🇺🇸

University Park, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath