Feasibility of in vivo image-guided navigation during a robot-assisted prostatectomy
- Conditions
- Prostate cancer10025506
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON54359
- Lead Sponsor
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 36
Inclusion Criteria
- >= 18 years old
- Scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
- Biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma
- Available pre-operative MRI of sufficient quality for making the 3D model
- Written and signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Allergic reaction to contrast agents in the past
- Metal implants in the pelvic area
- Defibrillator or pacemaker implant
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The main study endpoint is the feasibility of electromagnetic navigation during<br /><br>RARP. Electromagnetic navigation is considered feasible if in 85% of patients<br /><br>the technology can be applied successfully.<br /><br>A successful procedure includes: 1) successful placement of the EM sensors in<br /><br>the prostate and 2) accurate registration between the pre-operative 3D model of<br /><br>the patient and intra-operative situation. The registration is considered<br /><br>accurate if the mean target registration error is 1.0 cm or less. For assessing<br /><br>the accuracy of the registrations a set of independent positions of pre-defined<br /><br>anatomical structures and surfaces is used. </p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The first secondary study parameter is the added time to surgery due to<br /><br>deploying navigation. The second secondary study parameter is the accuracy of<br /><br>the different registration methods. </p><br>