A Trial Comparing Transversus Abdominis Plane Catheter Versus Epidural After Esophagectomy
- Conditions
- Esophageal CancerPain, Postoperative
- Interventions
- Procedure: EsophagectomyProcedure: Transversus abdominis plane catheterProcedure: Epidural
- Registration Number
- NCT03570996
- Lead Sponsor
- Swedish Medical Center
- Brief Summary
A randomized trial comparing perioperative outcomes between bilateral transversus abdominis plane TAP catheters with patient controlled analgesia (PCA) to epidural for esophagectomy patients with a VATS chest approach. Further objectives are to determine pain requirements between multiple modalities of pain control and compare the subsequent sequelae of narcotic use and blood pressure control and to compare complications such as anastomotic leak, atrial fibrillation and perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups.
- Detailed Description
Epidural analgesia is considered the 'gold standard' for post-operative analgesia following open esophagectomy. Epidurals have been shown to reduce post-operative pulmonary morbidity and mortality. However, epidurals are often associated with sympathetic blockade that creates hypotension and could therefore adversely affect the conduit. Pain management techniques that use peripheral nerve blockade are becoming more prevalent, reducing the need for an epidural. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters have been used in colorectal and abdominal surgery showing equivocal pain scores to epidurals. With the minimally invasive chest approach, the analgesia coverage focuses on the abdominal incision where both epidurals and TAPs are considered standard of care.
The investigators have completed a retrospective study in preparation for a randomized control trial. The investigators previous retrospective study found that TAP blocks/catheters are a reasonable alternative to epidurals, providing adequate pain coverage for abdominal incisions. The study found no statistical difference in pain scores between the two groups. The TAP group had a lower prevalence of hypotension and lower crystalloid resuscitation needs. Pulmonary complications were similar between the two groups. This retrospective review showed that TAP blocks are a reasonable alternative to epidurals and may reduce episodes of hypotension. The investigators aim is to now expand this study to a randomized control trial.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 38
- All adult individuals who undergo an esophagectomy with a minimally invasive approach of the chest at Swedish Medical Center-First Hill. These approaches include:
- 3 hole with R video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)
- Ivor Lewis R VATS
- Transhiatal
- Age <18
- Unable to consent
- Additional surgical procedures planned
- Patient with chronic pain on a daily regimen of narcotics
- Patients who remain intubated greater than 24 hours post operatively
- Non-English speaking
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Transversus abdominis plane catheter Transversus abdominis plane catheter Transversus abdominis plane catheter (TAP) for pain control in esophagectomy operations. TAP group will have bilateral subcostal TAP catheters and single shot bilateral rectus sheath blocks placed at the end of the surgery, prior to emergence. Bilateral subcostal TAP catheters will be bolused with 20ml of .2% ropivacaine on each side and then infused with .2% ropivacaine at 10ml/ hr for 75 hours each. Rectus sheath blocks will be bilateral bolus 20ml of .2% ropivacaine. Transversus abdominis plane catheter Esophagectomy Transversus abdominis plane catheter (TAP) for pain control in esophagectomy operations. TAP group will have bilateral subcostal TAP catheters and single shot bilateral rectus sheath blocks placed at the end of the surgery, prior to emergence. Bilateral subcostal TAP catheters will be bolused with 20ml of .2% ropivacaine on each side and then infused with .2% ropivacaine at 10ml/ hr for 75 hours each. Rectus sheath blocks will be bilateral bolus 20ml of .2% ropivacaine. epidural Esophagectomy Epidural pain control for pain control in esophagectomy operation. Patients randomize the TEP group will have bilateral TEP placed at T8-9 +/- one level based on patient anatomy. TEP will be bolused with 5ml of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine and then started on infusion of .0625% bupivacaine plus 4 mcg/ml fentanyl plus 2 mcg/ ml epinephrine at 6ml/hr with a range of 6-12 ml/hr, titrating to optimize patient comfort. Epidurals are placed before surgery start time. epidural Epidural Epidural pain control for pain control in esophagectomy operation. Patients randomize the TEP group will have bilateral TEP placed at T8-9 +/- one level based on patient anatomy. TEP will be bolused with 5ml of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine and then started on infusion of .0625% bupivacaine plus 4 mcg/ml fentanyl plus 2 mcg/ ml epinephrine at 6ml/hr with a range of 6-12 ml/hr, titrating to optimize patient comfort. Epidurals are placed before surgery start time.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain scores Up to post-operative day 4 Pain scores on a scale of 0-10 will be collected from patients twice a day
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Volume Resuscitation Up to post-operative day 4 Amount of fluids given to patient
Hypotension Up to post-operative day 4 Total episodes of hypotension
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Swedish Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States