TAP vs. ESP Block for Gynecological Post Operative Pain
- Conditions
- Pain, PostoperativeNerve Block
- Interventions
- Procedure: Transversus Abdominis Plane Block using 0.25% BupivacaineProcedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block using 0.25% Bupivacaine
- Registration Number
- NCT06044779
- Lead Sponsor
- Universitas Padjadjaran
- Brief Summary
The goal of this double blind randomized controlled trial is to compare transversus abdominis plane block and erector spinae plane block in gynecological surgery patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* What are the numerical post-operative pain scores in these two groups?
* Is there any significant difference in the numerical post-operative pain scores between subjects who underwent TAP block and subjects who underwent ESP block?
* What are the differences in the time needed for additional morphine in these two groups?
* Is there any significant differences in the time needed for additional morphine between subjects who underwent TAP block and subjects who underwent ESP block?
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Subjects with gynecological surgery techniques with a median incision include: hysterectomy, myomectomy, salpingectomy, ovarectomy and ovarian cystectomy.
- Subjects with physical status based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) in categories I-II
- Subjects who are willing to sign informed consent form.
- The patient has a history of allergies to local anesthetic drugs used for TAP blockade or ESP blockade and is allergic to morphine.
- Patients who have skin infections at the injection site.
- Patients with a history of chronic pain, namely a history of pain for more than 1 month obtained from history taking.
- Patients with a history of chronic pain treatment obtained from history taking.
- Patients with impaired kidney function (Ureum >39 mg/dL; Creatinine >1.3 mg/dL) and liver (SGOT >37 U/L; SGPT >59 U/L), myopathy, coagulopathy obtained from the results of supporting examinations, heart rhythm disorders obtained from the results of an EKG examination and neurological disorders in the form of hypesthesia or paraesthesia obtained from the results of a physical examination in the form of a sensory examination.
- The patient is pregnant as determined by history taking.
- Patients who are illiterate as obtained from history taking.
- The patient was uncooperative during examination.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Anesthestic Block Transversus Abdominis Plane Block using 0.25% Bupivacaine Ultrasound-guided TAP block is done using 20 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine administered at the lateral abdominal wall between the costal margin and the iliac crest Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Anesthetic Block Erector Spinae Plane Block using 0.25% Bupivacaine Ultrasound-guided ESP block is done using 20 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine administered at the tip of the transverse process at the T9 level
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative Numerical Rating Scale 24 hours post operative The degree of pain assessment is classified based on the Numeric Rating Scale pain assessment scale) with the lowest scale being no pain (value 0), up to the heaviest pain scale (value 10) when still, namely when the patient does not make any movement and moves, namely when mobilization is carried out on the left side and right tilt
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time of first need for analgesic rescue 24 hours post operative The time required by study subjects to press the PCA to obtain analgesics was first calculated from the time it was installed in the recovery room
Total postoperative morphine requirements 24 hours post operative The total amount of morphine required by study subjects over 24 hours to reduce postoperative pain
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hasan Sadikin General Hospital
🇮🇩Bandung, West Java, Indonesia