PSYCHO-EDUCATIONAL AND REHABILITATIVE INTERVENTION FOR CANCER CACHEXIA (PRICC)
- Conditions
- Cancer Cachexia
- Interventions
- Other: Psychoeducational and rehabilitative intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT04153019
- Lead Sponsor
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Reggio Emilia
- Brief Summary
Half of all cancer patients experience cachexia, with the prevalence rising above 80% in the last weeks of life. The cancer cachexia is a complex relational experience which involves the dyads patients-families. There are no studies on psychosocial interventions on dyads associated with rehabilitative interventions, to support more functional relationships to the management of cancer cachexia.
Primary objective: to evaluate the feasibility of a psycho-educational intervention combined with a physiotherapy intervention on the dyads. Secondary objective: improvement of the Quality of Life of dyads, acceptability of the intervention, adherence to each of the two components.
Methods: non-pharmacological interventional perspective, mixed-method study, addressed to a consecutive 30 cancer patients with cachexia and irreversible cachexia and their caregivers assisted by Hospital Palliative Care Unit.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Age of 18 years or older
- Good command of the Italian language
- Written informed consent
- Histologically confirmed tumor diagnosis
- Presence of irreversible cachexia and cachexia (ESPEN3-5 guidelines, MUST calculation)
- Patients who have identified a caregiver
- Patients and family members are informed of the diagnosis and the objectives of the therapies and who have reported awareness of the disease phase (evaluated by the palliative doctor).
- Patients with prognosis less than three months to enable the rehabilitative intervention
- Presence of important mental disorder or dementia
- Severe sensory deficit
- Presence of diffuse bone metastases that put the patient at risk of fracture during rehabilitation exercise.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cancer cachexia Psychoeducational and rehabilitative intervention Psycho-educational session: 3 weekly face-to-face consultations between a dyads (patients-caregivers) and trained nurses, helping them to cope with cancer cachexia strengthening dyadic coping resources; 2) Rehabilitation program: 3 sessions with physiotherapists including educational component for patients self-management on physical activity and goal-setting, personalized program of exercises stretching and relaxation + 3 home sessions per week, self-managed by dyads.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility of the intervention After 2 months The proportion of number of dyads who completed the intervention / involved dyads will be evaluated. Compliance will be assessed for each individual component (psycho-social and rehabilitative intervention). The overall intervention will be evaluated feasible if there is compliance greater than or equal to 50 percent to both interventions.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hand-Grip Strenght Test After 2 months Measurement of isometric muscle strength of the patient's upper limbs. The best out of three attempts is accounted for.
30 seconds sit-to stand test After 2 months Evaluation of functionally the strength of the lower limbs. The test counts the number of times the patient can get up from a chair without arms within a period of 30 second.
Ad hoc semi-structured interviews with nurses and physiotherapists After 2 months Qualitative evaluation of the perception of the benefits or difficulties during the intervention.
Functional Assessment of Anorexia-Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) After 1 months Evaluation of anorexia-cachexia related distress. Each item is scored 0-4 (0=Not at all; 4= Very much). Higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) After 1 months Measurement of the caregiver's perceived burden of providing family. Each item is scored 0-4 (0=Never; 4=Nearly always). Total score ranging: 0-88. Higher scores indicating greater burden.
Ad-hoc semi-structured interviews aimed at the dyad After 2 months Qualitative evaluation of the perception of the benefits, good adherence to the intervention or difficulties.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Loredana Buonaccorso
🇮🇹Reggio Emilia, Emilia Romagna, Italy