Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT06628492
NCT06628492Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Comparative Assessment for the Positional Accuracy of Dental Implants Inserted by Computerized Surgical Guides Fabricated From Different Printing Materials

Suez Canal University0 sites12 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2024Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
12
Primary Endpoint
linear deviation of inserted implant
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaArms & InterventionsOutcomesInvestigatorsRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

implant will be inserted in patients with kennedy class 3 or 4 partially edentulous mandible .the implants will be inserted using teeth supported surgical guide fabricated from two different materials

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
21 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with skeletal Angle´s class I maxilla-mandibular relationship,
  • •adequate inter-arch distance, have Kennedy class 3 or 4 partially edentulous mandible of more than 2 teeth missed and will be applied for the treatment of tooth loss and requiring fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation
  • •normal Physical and psychological status to tolerate conventional implant procedures,
  • •Their residual ridge had sufficient bone volume for implant installation and was covered by firm mucoperiosteum.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy and immunocompromised patients.
  • •Patients with, systemic disease that might complicate post-operative healing or contribute to bone resorption, e.g uncontrolled diabetes, psychological disorders, or alcohol, tobacco, or drug abuse
  • •parafunctional habits, poor oral hygiene, limited mouth opening, severe alveolar bone deficiencies,

Arms & Interventions

group B implant inserted by resin surgical guide

Active Comparator

Intervention: resin printed surgical guide (Device)

group A implant inserted by stainless steel surgical guide

Experimental

Intervention: stainless steel printed surgical guide (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

linear deviation of inserted implant

Time Frame: 1 month

coronal and apical deviation of inserted implant from virtually planned one in millimeter.

angular deviation of inserted implant

Time Frame: 1 month

angular deviation of inserted implant from virtually planned one in angles.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Accuracy of Computer Guided Four Implants Placement in Completely Edentulous MandibleImplant Placement
NCT06571968Mansoura University36
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of proper implant positioning of total knee arthroplastyOsteoarthritis of Knee , osteonecrosis of knee , rheumatoid arthritisD020370Osteoarthritis of Knee
JPRN-jRCT1052210124Tomita Tetsuya20
Completed
Phase 2
Clinical Investigation of Mandibular Implant OverdentureDental Implantation
NCT00066014Virginia Commonwealth University30
Unknown
Not Applicable
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different CBCT-derived TemplatesJaw, Edentulous, Partially
NCT02772172Sun Yat-sen University30
Completed
Not Applicable
Accuracy of Fully Guided Versus Half Guided ImplantComplete Edentulism
NCT06542562October University for Modern Sciences and Arts16